Sad Dénouement of l'Affaire Durham

nsacpi

nsacpi

Expects Yuge Games
Robert Luskin, a criminal defense lawyer and former Justice Department prosecutor who represented two witnesses Mr. Durham interviewed, said that he had a hard time squaring Mr. Durham’s prior reputation as an independent-minded straight shooter with his end-of-career conduct as Mr. Barr’s special counsel.

“This stuff has my head spinning,” Mr. Luskin said. “When did these guys drink the Kool-Aid, and who served it to them?”

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/26/...0ud0OXRK1OIBAaXSTluV8S-sQ-499S&smid=share-url
 
Delivering the closing arguments in the Danchenko trial, Mr. Durham defended his investigation to the jury, denying that his appointment by Mr. Barr had been tainted by politics.

He asserted that Mr. Mueller had concluded “there’s no evidence of collusion here or conspiracy” — a formulation that echoed Mr. Trump’s distortion of the Russia investigation’s complex findings — and added: “Is it the wrong question to ask, well, then how did this get started? Respectfully, that’s not the case.”

The judge interrupted him: “You should finish up, Mr. Durham.”
 
57Brave said:
and again the thumb of Bill Barr
Click to expand...

1072457460.jpeg
 
There is a clear need for Garland to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the abuses associated with Durham's appointment.
 
not sure what laws Durham could have broken.
Disregard of policy yes , but breaking DOJ rules isn't a crime
what can they do to him ?
to my understanding Barr might be a whole other can o' fish

Durham was just a fool.
Which we can be certain those few here can and will relate.

Which takes us back to McGonigal and that age old question, what propaganda ?
 
57Brave said:
not sure what laws Durham could have broken.
Disregard of policy yes , but breaking DOJ rules isn't a crime
what can they do to him ?
to my understanding Barr might be a whole other can o' fish

Durham was just a fool.
Which we can be certain those few here can and will relate.

Which takes us back to McGonigal and that age old question, what propaganda ?
Click to expand...

Can you explain in your own words what propaganda took trump over the top in 2016?

(This is the part you become mentally impotent for us all to see)
 
57Brave said:
not sure what laws Durham could have broken.
Disregard of policy yes , but breaking DOJ rules isn't a crime
what can they do to him ?
to my understanding Barr might be a whole other can o' fish

Durham was just a fool.
Which we can be certain those few here can and will relate.

Which takes us back to McGonigal and that age old question, what propaganda ?
Click to expand...

Either way abuse of prosecutorial discretion and an appointment that is politically tainted
 
nsacpi said:
There is a clear need for Garland to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the abuses associated with Durham's appointment.
Click to expand...

lol. In court Durham showed that Hillary was responsible for the Alfa Bank nonsense and the FBI used the dossier without assuring its authenticity. With all of the facts available to you you still can't figure out that the Russian collusion investigation was corrupt, partisan nonsense.
 
Last edited:
What do we do now that Durhams investigational been exposed as a coup attempt. Hanging? Bring back the firing squad?





Since I know I am dealing with mental midgets let me make it clear I am mocking you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top