Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

[Garmel]

You mean a radical judges interpretation that is obviously deeply biased? Ok - you keep thinking the judiciary should legislate executive functions. Just like a typical Marxist - until of course they are in power.

It's looking like the clown appellate court in DC agrees with the judge.

Same group of judges who thought giving people invited in the capital jail time for trespassing or give the trespassers more time with imaginary 18 U.S.C. § 1512 interpretations.

 

[zitothebrave]

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...ent-war-plans-atlantic-journalist-1235302437/

Imagine talking about classified military operations over a group text with a journalist from the Atlantic.

This is what happens when you promote a floor worker to CEO without any prep.

 

[thethe]

The face of this looks bad but sometimes leaking of information is intentional - And its happened time and time again across world history.

There is a realistic world where this was completely intentional so that the information was leaked to the public.

 

[thethe]

Tesla up 12% today - How is Waltz feeling?

 

[sturg33]

The face of this looks bad but sometimes leaking of information is intentional - And its happened time and time again across world history.

There is a realistic world where this was completely intentional so that the information was leaked to the public.

cmon dude

 

[thethe]

cmon dude

All I'm saying is its possible - Its not the most likely scenario for sure.

 

[chop2chip]

The face of this looks bad but sometimes leaking of information is intentional - And its happened time and time again across world history.

There is a realistic world where this was completely intentional so that the information was leaked to the public.

That’s definitely one way to interpret what happened

 

[mqt]

Perhaps there are consequences to making an alcoholic tv show personality the Secretary of Defense.

 

[mqt]

The face of this looks bad but sometimes leaking of information is intentional - And its happened time and time again across world history.

There is a realistic world where this was completely intentional so that the information was leaked to the public.

Did they give you one of those Epstein binders or something?

 

[zitothebrave]

The face of this looks bad but sometimes leaking of information is intentional - And its happened time and time again across world history.

There is a realistic world where this was completely intentional so that the information was leaked to the public.

Trump when brought up about it didn't know anything about it. Which means either his cabinet is going rogue, or he has no clue what's going on and doesn't care.

 

[thethe]

Perhaps there are consequences to making an alcoholic tv show personality the Secretary of Defense.

It was Waltz who invited him to the Signal chat from what I read.

 

[nsacpi]

[tw]1903967217458319739[/tw]

 

[thethe]

Trump when brought up about it didn't know anything about it. Which means either his cabinet is going rogue, or he has no clue what's going on and doesn't care.

Rogue meaning discussing policy/strategy in what should have been a secured chat?

 

[thethe]

[tw]1904294705174811044[/tw]

Voted for this

 

[thethe]

[tw]1904214716781592916[/tw]

"They don't know what htey are doing!"

 

[mqt]

Rogue meaning discussing policy/strategy in what should have been a secured chat?

Weird way to frame leaking the entire process of the most delicate possible situation imaginable: authorizing military force *and* the priorities of our post-strike diplomacy before we conducted the strike. Imagine if that reporter had instead notified an enemy in exchange for money? These are the very journalists *you’ve* been accusing of being part of a fraud ring in DC, after all.

 

[mqt]

[tw]1904214716781592916[/tw]

"They don't know what htey are doing!"

I shouldn’t need to tell you that “we’re going to create jobs and bring down costs” is not evidence of anybody knowing what they’re doing. It’s what every government official has said since the dawn of time.

 

[mqt]

Rogue meaning discussing policy/strategy in what should have been a secured chat?

If this were Kamala Harris and Lloyd Austin, you’d be calling for a military tribunal and a public execution.

 

[thethe]

I shouldn’t need to tell you that “we’re going to create jobs and bring down costs” is not evidence of anybody knowing what they’re doing. It’s what every government official has said since the dawn of time.

By reducing government employment and putting them back to private sector?

 

[thethe]

Weird way to frame leaking the entire process of the most delicate possible situation imaginable: authorizing military force *and* the priorities of our post-strike diplomacy before we conducted the strike. Imagine if that reporter had instead notified an enemy in exchange for money? These are the very journalists *you’ve* been accusing of being part of a fraud ring in DC, after all.

You’re conflating two things. The discussion is fine. Waltz inviting a journalist to a secret chat is a whole other discussion.