Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread


Over time we always get back to the a basic truth.

Trump was right.

I can't imagine the hysterical nature of some on this forum when Trump struck Iran.


All you did was confirm that Bill Maher doesnt have any bias against Trump since he says when he thinks Trump is right even if few people on the left agree. So congrats, the guy who thinks Trump is a criminal who tried to overthrow the government also thinks Trump was right to strike Iran. I dont know how you see that as a win. And to answer your question. When Trump struck Iran we just mocked you and others who called him Anti-war. He was simultantiously extremely pro-war and extremely anti-war at the same time because people like you just ignore what you dont like so it allowed him to play to both sides.
 
All you did was confirm that Bill Maher doesnt have any bias against Trump since he says when he thinks Trump is right even if few people on the left agree. So congrats, the guy who thinks Trump is a criminal who tried to overthrow the government also thinks Trump was right to strike Iran. I dont know how you see that as a win. And to answer your question. When Trump struck Iran we just mocked you and others who called him Anti-war. He was simultantiously extremely pro-war and extremely anti-war at the same time because people like you just ignore what you dont like so it allowed him to play to both sides.
Maher is always on the 'Trump is wrong side' first (as many in here) and then over time realizes that he was wrong.

Its a common occurrence.
 

These are serious crimes - Must have criminal prosecutions.
Serious Crimes, like when Trump on the campaign trail lied about Mexico paying for the Border Wall? Or when Trump on the campaign trail lied about Haitian immigrants eating pets? Or when Trump on the Campaign trail made it a point to make his rallying cry lock her up, then never even attempted to go after Hillary?
 
I'd classify trying to destroy democracy again probably above all those but thats just me.
Even if I grant that what they’re doing here is outright lying about Trump rather than several other more charitable interpretations, lying about your political opponent is destroying democracy?
 
What? Someone is claiming there’s some sort of smoking gun exposing major crimes here and pointing at evidence that doesn’t suggest that. Tell me how I’m wrong.
At this point, its been debunked multiple times, multiple ways.

If you want to just stand there with your fingers in your ears about ORANGE MAN BAD!!! you can. But you look ridiculous.

If to change your mind you think someone is going to come forward an cop to it, then just be consistent with your standard of proof.
 
Back
Top