Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

thethe said:
And they are a global terrorist organization.

Its not hard to put two and two together.

These freaks don't just show up to places coordinated by chance.
Click to expand...
I had missed this earlier, but by this logic, a post on a Discord server or Facebook page saying to meet at some city block for a protest is basically conspiracy to commit terrorism.
 
Tish James indicted.

Left us so stupid. All they had to do was not be lunatics and none of this would be happening. Now all bets are off.
 
thethe said:
Tish James indicted.

Left us so stupid. All they had to do was not be lunatics and none of this would be happening. Now all bets are off.
Click to expand...

Just like Comey's it's pretty much an open and shut case but where the case is located getting a guilty verdict will be hard.
 
mqt said:
So it would have been fine for James to commit mortgage fraud if the left hadn’t been lunatics?
Click to expand...

Yes, if they didn't try to take Trump down for accounting entries this would not have happened.

This crime could probably be charged to hundreds of thousands of people.

Its the fact the left tried to use this to 'Get Trump' (similar to the LOGAN ACT) is why its coming back at them.
 
Garmel said:
Just like Comey's it's pretty much an open and shut case but where the case is located getting a guilty verdict will be hard.
Click to expand...
I feel like this is both the legal folly and political shrewdness of Trump’s strategy with James. It really shouldn’t be hard to get people to convict their state’s AG for the types of fraud that rich people get away with all the time. But Trump has done such a specific job of making this look like a political witch hunt that it both might reduce the likelihood of a conviction *and* serve him politically whether she’s convicted or not. If she is, he took down the corrupt AG. If he didn’t, it’s because of the left.
 
thethe said:
Yes, if they didn't try to take Trump down for accounting entries this would not have happened.

This crime could probably be charged to hundreds of thousands of people.

Its the fact the left tried to use this to 'Get Trump' (similar to the LOGAN ACT) is why its coming back at them.
Click to expand...
Then just start charging those hundreds of thousands of people instead of making this an obvious political hatchet job?
 
mqt said:
I feel like this is both the legal folly and political shrewdness of Trump’s strategy with James. It really shouldn’t be hard to get people to convict their state’s AG for the types of fraud that rich people get away with all the time. But Trump has done such a specific job of making this look like a political witch hunt that it both might reduce the likelihood of a conviction *and* serve him politically whether she’s convicted or not. If she is, he took down the corrupt AG. If he didn’t, it’s because of the left.
Click to expand...

Trump's biggest weakness is that he can't keep his trap shut.
 
thethe said:
That’s all you need to know then about its legitimacy.

What did Obama do again to deserve it?
Click to expand...
I forgot to respond to this, but Obama didn’t deserve it either. As far as I’m concerned, in a contest in which the entire world is eligible for an award for peace, any nation’s leader who has used their military to harm others should pretty clearly be ineligible. Trump’s strikes on the Houthis and cartel boats (and active celebration of it on social media, complete with videos of the strikes) should leave him out of the conversation just as Obama’s continuation of our Middle East conflicts and drone strikes should have done the same. The only thing I can’t really recall is if he’d already begun his drone strikes by then. I think he had? The Nobel Institute got that one wrong.
 
mqt said:
I forgot to respond to this, but Obama didn’t deserve it either. As far as I’m concerned, in a contest in which the entire world is eligible for an award for peace, any nation’s leader who has used their military to harm others should pretty clearly be ineligible. Trump’s strikes on the Houthis and cartel boats (and active celebration of it on social media, complete with videos of the strikes) should leave him out of the conversation just as Obama’s continuation of our Middle East conflicts and drone strikes should have done the same. The only thing I can’t really recall is if he’d already begun his drone strikes by then. I think he had? The Nobel Institute got that one wrong.
Click to expand...
What about lives saved because of the deal.

Thats more than anyone else could lay claim to
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top