Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

acesfull86 said:
I’m glad it meets your standards
Click to expand...
You made a choice with your dollars. Plenty of other neighborhoods with more blacks to choose from.....

Now you didn't go into the decision with that in mind but you probably walked around the area / checked out the schools / looked at crime stats and there you go! Massive coincidence.....
 
thethe said:
You made a choice with your dollars. Plenty of other neighborhoods with more blacks to choose from.....

Now you didn't go into the decision with that in mind but you probably walked around the area / checked out the schools / looked at crime stats and there you go! Massive coincidence.....
Click to expand...
Weirdly it’s a better area than my previous apartment, yet the “black” population is higher. If I just blindly chose the area with fewer “blacks,” I’d be in a less safe neighborhood. But I looked at data that actually matters, rather than rely on broad stereotypes, because I don’t see the utility in relying on shoddy information when better information is readily available.
 
This discussion isn’t about whether disparities across groups exist - of course they do. The discussion is whether you elevate the group disparity over the individual’s merit in cases where you have good, reliable data on the individual.

I was told in the immigration thread that it’s impossible to get good data to assess individual merit, therefore a blanket ban is acceptable. OK, I disagree, but I at least see the point.

What I don’t understand is this rigid insistence on ignoring individual merit in real world examples where that data IS readily available. Now I’m being told it’s perfectly reasonable to disregard that information and continue to treat people as median representations of a group identity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top