Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

thethe said:
Yes- the results of an election where a campaign central promise was a massive deportation force shouldn’t be revealing to you.

I love that your side isn’t learning. Keep it up!
Click to expand...

You seem to assume two incorrect things:

1) That this election was decided primarily because of social issues and immigration. I think it’s that Harris ran a campaign targeted at voter that apparently didn’t exist.

2) That it’s persuasive to say that because a majority of people think mass deportation is needed (which I also don’t know is true) that it’s actually good economic policy. I don’t think Dems need to soften on migrants, they just need to do a better job in the future of showing how living conditions for most Americans are impacted by much bigger issues than immigration.
 
It's amazing you can call people like Maher and Stewart bootlickers when you literally worship at Trump's feet.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Carp said:
It's amazing you can call people like Maher and Stewart bootlickers when you literally worship at Trump's feet.
Click to expand...

Yup - your worship is my praise for the singular man who stood in the breech against the globalist left and is about to usher in an age of abundance.

Guilty!!!
 
mqt said:
You seem to assume two incorrect things:

1) That this election was decided primarily because of social issues and immigration. I think it’s that Harris ran a campaign targeted at voter that apparently didn’t exist.

2) That it’s persuasive to say that because a majority of people think mass deportation is needed (which I also don’t know is true) that it’s actually good economic policy. I don’t think Dems need to soften on migrants, they just need to do a better job in the future of showing how living conditions for most Americans are impacted by much bigger issues than immigration.
Click to expand...

I hope the Dems take this approach.

Then when wages are up and costs/crime is down coincidentally after the first few million are out of here the left will lost in even more spectacular fashion
 
thethe said:
I hope the Dems take this approach.

Then when wages are up and costs/crime is down coincidentally after the first few million are out of here the left will lost in even more spectacular fashion
Click to expand...

Honestly if every bit of that comes to pass and we usher in a generation of prosperity for the working class than I will come back and let you ridicule me. But things were bad for the working class under every other President and before we ever heard about a supposed border crisis. The economic forces driven by deporting all your farm workers doesn’t sound particularly appealing to my food budget, though.
 
thethe said:
Yup - your worship is my praise for the singular man who stood in the breech against the globalist left and is about to usher in an age of abundance.

Guilty!!!
Click to expand...

There is no point arguing with you, because you don't have an ounce of impartiality when it comes to Trump. Trump is not infallible.

You've spent most of the last 4 years questioning everything single thing the government does. News flash: you should still be questioning everything the government does.
 
Carp said:
There is no point arguing with you, because you don't have an ounce of impartiality when it comes to Trump. Trump is not infallible.

You've spent most of the last 4 years questioning everything single thing the government does. News flash: you should still be questioning everything the government does.
Click to expand...

TRUE
 
thethe said:
You said he isn’t figuring out any of the math. Exact words.

Hysterically wrong but it’s ok for you to be so.
Click to expand...

Correct. He's not. He also isn't specifically designing anything. He runs the company and is involved with the process and pushes his team like a good CEO does (like Jobs did), but he let's his team do what they need to do without his constant oversight.
 
Carp said:
There is no point arguing with you, because you don't have an ounce of impartiality when it comes to Trump. Trump is not infallible.

You've spent most of the last 4 years questioning everything single thing the government does. News flash: you should still be questioning everything the government does.
Click to expand...

In should question the current government fufilling campaign promises?
 
mqt said:
Honestly if every bit of that comes to pass and we usher in a generation of prosperity for the working class than I will come back and let you ridicule me. But things were bad for the working class under every other President and before we ever heard about a supposed border crisis. The economic forces driven by deporting all your farm workers doesn’t sound particularly appealing to my food budget, though.
Click to expand...

Oddly enough there was no better time for the working class in the last fifty years than under Trump term 1. Well until the ccp virus was released.

Fortunately automation has drastically reduced thebneed for low skill agriculture.
 
thethe said:
In should question the current government fufilling campaign promises?
Click to expand...

I’d like to think you should *at least* question whether deploying the National Guard domestically in a state that doesn’t want it there is a good step in fulfilling one of those promises.
 
thethe said:
Oddly enough there was no better time for the working class in the last fifty years than under Trump term 1. Well until the ccp virus was released.
Click to expand...

My memory is not short enough to forget that by and large it was the same experience as all of the other years.
 
Imagine not being grateful to Trump that we didn’t see the globalists left fully takeover this country and wield power from all three branches.
 
mqt said:
My memory is not short enough to forget that by and large it was the same experience as all of the other years.
Click to expand...

Real wages went up for the working class and economics are the most important factor in determining conditions for working class in the country.
 
mqt said:
I’d like to think you should *at least* question whether deploying the National Guard domestically in a state that doesn’t want it there is a good step in fulfilling one of those promises.
Click to expand...

A state has no basis to dictate federal immigration laws that were made by the federal legislature.

It’s not the act of not of using the national guard that’s wrong. It’s the fact that it would be even needed is what’s wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top