Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

So you two dispute that the charges are only being dropped because a sitting President can't be prosecuted?

And I changed my sig because it would be misleading now. You were wrong then that proof had been found to overturn the election in 2020 and you are still wrong about it.
 
It was a complete bull**** prosecution aimed at influencing an election.

Based on garbage - was always garbage. Only seemed valid to garbage people.
 
If a certain someone didn’t wrap their whole identity up in getting trump but being a chill guy stayin neutral, it wouldn’t be so funny

And the sig change is even funnier
 
Tapate50 said:
If a certain someone didn’t wrap their whole identity up in getting trump but being a chill guy stayin neutral, it wouldn’t be so funny

And the sig change is even funnier
Click to expand...

You must be new because I have advocated for charges against a lot of people. I wanted charges against Bush for lying us into Iraq and war crimes related to torture. I wanted Hillary charged in 2016. I want Biden to go to prison for his role in the war on drugs or as I called it the Holocaust in slow motion. But somehow when I advocate the same for Trump you people lose your minds. When I say I am neutral I mean I want Joe and Hunter Biden, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Trump to go to prison. I only get mad when you people bring BS in here instead of reasoned logical arguments. I am more than fine if you like Trump's policies. I am just not okay with the pretending the most corrupt man in America is some paragon of virtue.
 
cajunrevenge said:
So you two dispute that the charges are only being dropped because a sitting President can't be prosecuted?

And I changed my sig because it would be misleading now. You were wrong then that proof had been found to overturn the election in 2020 and you are still wrong about it.
Click to expand...

No, I dispute " His whole defense strategy was hinged on never having to face a trial because he knows he would lose"

He would probably lose the case but would be laughed out of an appellate court.

Seriously, you need to quit watching the MSM and lawyers on YouTube.
 
Pam Bondi has said she plans to "get" Nancy Pelosi before even taking office. Do our friends still think that's inappropriate and should bar her from investigating and/or prosecuting Pelosi?
 
cajunrevenge said:
Pam Bondi has said she plans to "get" Nancy Pelosi before even taking office. Do our friends still think that's inappropriate and should bar her from investigating and/or prosecuting Pelosi?
Click to expand...

Did Pam Bondi run for office?

Is Pelosi guilty of insider trading?
 
Tapate50 said:
Did Pam Bondi run for office?

Is Pelosi guilty of insider trading?
Click to expand...

And further- our democrat friends said this was fine, so im good with it. Maybe we can find the most right leaning judge in the country to levy the largest financial fines on them ever done. Really follow lock step with how its been done the last 4 years.

Law and order!
 
Tapate50 said:
Did Pam Bondi run for office?

Is Pelosi guilty of insider trading?
Click to expand...

Thats a strange distinction to make. Trump ran on "getting" his perceived political enemies. Are you saying you would have been fine if James just appointed someone else to investigate Trump who said they were going to "get" Trump before?
 
thethe said:
[tw]1861201014772433332[/tw]
Click to expand...

This si why Trump and Co are moronic.

If the drugs are illegally coming through Mexico, how the **** will a Tariff effect it at all? If anything it woudl raise the price on legal produced product coming in and push people to the black market.
 
Tapate50 said:
And further- our democrat friends said this was fine, so im good with it. Maybe we can find the most right leaning judge in the country to levy the largest financial fines on them ever done. Really follow lock step with how its been done the last 4 years.

Law and order!
Click to expand...

I was cheering Trump on when he said he was going to "get" Hillary. So go ahead and investigate by Pelosi and anyone else you want. I wont be crying about it like you people. You will just get laughed out of court. Or do we not remember how the Durham investigation ended. I want you people to engage in lawfare. I want each side going after the other because its clear each side wont hold their own accountable to the law.
 
One other thing is I dont understand the hate for Mueller and Smith. They were the most unbiased professional any person could possibly be and arent even Democrats.
 
zitothebrave said:
This si why Trump and Co are moronic.

If the drugs are illegally coming through Mexico, how the **** will a Tariff effect it at all? If anything it woudl raise the price on legal produced product coming in and push people to the black market.
Click to expand...

If you don't have cooperation with the government of the country that houses the Cartels base of operations you have nothing.

You truly are a moron.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top