Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

The amount of you guys so uncritically using the words of a corrupt (D) politician as support for your side is a bit odd. I’d have thought the wire fraud guy would be someone whose support I wasn’t chasing.

I’ve been vocal that these are just clout chasers now that the left will be out of power for a generation. They are all Bill Mahersband Jon Stewart’s. They can ride in the bush just have no say moving forward.
 
I’ve been vocal that these are just clout chasers now that the left will be out of power for a generation. They are all Bill Mahersband Jon Stewart’s. They can ride in the bush just have no say moving forward.

If there are so many, I’d perhaps simply avoid the ones who are currently under investigation for political corruption while making my point about how my side is being shown to be right.
 
If there are so many, I’d perhaps simply avoid the ones who are currently under investigation for political corruption while making my point about how my side is being shown to be right.

The two have nothing to do with each other.
 
You will not find me amongst the supporters of the pharmaceutical companies, but this is nothing but word salad.

Word salad? You mean the introductory framework on comprehensive investigation into big pharma?

We understand you won’t like anything of what this admin does.
 
Word salad? You mean the introductory framework on comprehensive investigation into big pharma?

We understand you won’t like anything of what this admin does.

I would love if they took on the pharmaceutical industry over its pricing or for pushing opioids on the masses, but I suspect a lot of that wouldn’t have any criminal liability and RICO is the exact type of buzzword-y legalese that gets people excited over nothing.
 
Guy who is under investigation for lying and abusing his power suddenly shifting to the right on a bunch of issues as Trump takes office does seem like it could be related.

He went against immigration narrative before election and then was investigated. Important detail you conveniently ignored.
 
I would love if they took on the pharmaceutical industry over its pricing or for pushing opioids on the masses, but I suspect a lot of that wouldn’t have any criminal liability and RICO is the exact type of buzzword-y legalese that gets people excited over nothing.

Rico as a concept is a wide net investigation to get more witness talking. It’s a common strategy in the opening stages of big investigations.
 
I see lots of cultists celebrating this.

Of course, all this is the government picking winners and losers. In this case. The winners are the ultra wealthy corporations who can do this no problem, and the loser is the small business trying to compete not afforded this pay to play luxury

Trump should slash regulations on ALL companies, not just the ones who can afford billion dollar investments like Walmart and Amazon

[Tw]1866567281008054480[/tw]
 
[tw]1866879385846026553[/tw]

People do understand that the democrats have been funneling foreign donations through act blue for decades right?
 
The Democrat party was a vessel for foreign influence and globalist dictates.

Just pathetic anyone voted for them recently.
 
Back
Top