Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

Wray did not say

We are at the inevitable point where those that denied its existence are now saying “OF COURSE THERE WERE FBI ASSETS IN THE CROWD! It would eb irresponsible to not”

Let’s ignore the fact that hundreds of trump rally’s resulted in no violence in the past.
 
We are at the inevitable point where those that denied its existence are now saying “OF COURSE THERE WERE FBI ASSETS IN THE CROWD! It would eb irresponsible to not”

Let’s ignore the fact that hundreds of trump rally’s resulted in no violence in the past.

I’m pretty sure those hundreds of Trump rallies in the past weren’t planned as Stop the Steal events located right next to the place the steal was allegedly happening, my guy.
 
I’m pretty sure those hundreds of Trump rallies in the past weren’t planned as Stop the Steal events located right next to the place the steal was allegedly happening, my guy.

Oh yeah the proximity is going to all of a sudden make them violent.

Sure Jan
 
Oh yeah the proximity is going to all of a sudden make them violent.

Sure Jan

This might actually be the dumbest argument you’ve made thus far about January 6th. They had a goddamn march to the Capitol where the people in attendance believed Congress was illegally making Joe Biden the President. It’s like seeing a championship riot break out and wondering if the Feds did it because the fans weren’t flipping cars inside the stadium. The context of the event matters a little bit.
 
This might actually be the dumbest argument you’ve made thus far about January 6th. They had a goddamn march to the Capitol where the people in attendance believed Congress was illegally making Joe Biden the President. It’s like seeing a championship riot break out and wondering if the Feds did it because the fans weren’t flipping cars inside the stadium. The context of the event matters a little bit.

The context of no violence in the hundreds of rally’s prior you mean?
 
and here we go ...

bafkreibj7dpvum3pvd3k5t3dqvqrtmgyg7v73ktma4g2az2veqnzdxmb2a@jpeg
 
[tw]1867534180134904258[/tw]

Sure hope this is about condensing agencies and not removing consumer protections.
 
what do you think ?

Protection from the banks is a good thing and should not be weakened, but simply calling for the removal of an agency isn’t necessarily calling for a removal of a law/policy. My worry with the upcoming 2nd Trump economy is his collection of policy proposals that he has been blabbering about creating a combination of protectionist measures that hurt consumers tied to concessions on regulations that will allow companies to hurt consumers and austerity measures that impact the poorest Americans.
 
Anyone surprised is a fool. Trump is a liberal who has no interest in fighting the culture war, this won't stand up for women

But he sure as hell sell perfume and vow to end daylight savings time!

[Tw]1867384016883638518[/tw]
 
Protection from the banks is a good thing and should not be weakened, but simply calling for the removal of an agency isn’t necessarily calling for a removal of a law/policy. My worry with the upcoming 2nd Trump economy is his collection of policy proposals that he has been blabbering about creating a combination of protectionist measures that hurt consumers tied to concessions on regulations that will allow companies to hurt consumers and austerity measures that impact the poorest Americans.

We’ll see. QVC did campaign on capping interest rates which is about as anti-banking as it gets.
 
Back
Top