Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

[tw]1886905073193640169[/tw]

Hmm - Looks like yet again Trump and team understand US laws more than random message board poster.

Big men with big ideas - This isn't your daddy's government any longer.

Get violent POS out of this country.

But....but...their loved ones can't see them. lol
 
But....but...their loved ones can't see them. lol

Soon the leftists will say you need to place violent criminals in prisons less htan 50 miles from ALL their loved ones.

Not sure how thats possible but figure it out!
 
I don’t get what Trump is trying to do in Gaza. Stay away from the barbarians. Let the Israelis deal with it.
 
[tw]1886905073193640169[/tw]

Hmm - Looks like yet again Trump and team understand US laws more than random message board poster.

Big men with big ideas - This isn't your daddy's government any longer.

Get violent POS out of this country.

Or Trump is willing to break the law.
 

I suppose we’ll find out who is right soon enough. Perhaps it’s you, but the “fraud by way of claiming not to be in a gang” for losing citizenship seems a bit dodgy at best, and makes me think the play here ends up just being to move migrants.
 
Or Trump is willing to break the law.

I'm sure your concerns about Trump's executive overreach are sincere... but they are going to land flat with us after 4 years of your silence or acceptance of one of the most tyrannical presidents in history. The best we could get from you was "I don't like this... but... still voting (D)

So thanks for the concern. But the party you supported laid out the playbook... break the law over and over and make the opposition spend their energy and money hoping the supermen court overturns it.

Have fun
 
She's not stupid. But being a mult-term congresswoman doesn't mean anything. We've all seen videos of them not knowing the basics of the internet, thinking an island can get too populated that it will tip over, among other things that even average people know.

None of that has to do with the functioning of the government
 
I'm sure your concerns about Trump's executive overreach are sincere... but they are going to land flat with us after 4 years of your silence or acceptance of one of the most tyrannical presidents in history. The best we could get from you was "I don't like this... but... still voting (D)

So thanks for the concern. But the party you supported laid out the playbook... break the law over and over and make the opposition spend their energy and money hoping the supermen court overturns it.

Have fun

Me for four years: “hey, some of this kind of sucks but the alternative isn’t any better.”

MAGA following the same behavior this month: “This is so ****ing awesome that Trump is breaking the laws and I hope he breaks more laws.”

You can call my objections to executive overreach insufficient under Biden, but I wasn’t parading around suggesting the Constitution is whatever Dear Leader says it is today. I don’t understand the hostility regarding my position on the same behavior I disapproved of under Biden being used to stop Malaria prevention because the richest man in the world was given the keys to the government with apparently no oversight seems more bad to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[tw]1886970654622454231[/tw]

God willing because it sounds like he is about to make an Iraq level mistake.
 
[tw]1886983296518631914[/tw]

Meanwhile - Trump has literally been a 'Principled Conservatives' wet dream.
 
Do you think she knows how the treasury and usaid operates? Or that she's been given a set of talking points to be upset about?

Do you think this cunt knows how it operates? Or he's just being told to do something by FElon who has an axe to grind

image-2.png
 
When discussing a one-state or two-state solution, I did not have my money on a two-state solution, but one of those states is actually the United States.
 
Back
Top