Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

No I do understand it you do not.

Let me use ye old internet to explain it to you.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120829094739/http://w2.eff.org/Net_culture/Folklore/Humor/godwins.law

"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison
involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one."

" As soon as such a comparison occurs, someone will start a
Nazi-discussion spinoff thread on alt.censorship."

The point of Godwin's law is to end a debate because it will spiral off topic. Something that's a favorite tactic of yours.

You are completely misunderstand the whole point of Godwins law - Its meant to shut down a conversation by comparing something to what the Nazi's did as if its the same thing.

Explaining why the people of Germany elected the Nazi's has absolutely nothing to do with that.
 
[tw]1892651530924298385[/tw]

Stephen Miller was frequently targeted as public enemy number 1 because of how knowledgeable he is and how well he communicates. One of the top people in the Trump admin hands down.
 
You are completely misunderstand the whole point of Godwins law - Its meant to shut down a conversation by comparing something to what the Nazi's did as if its the same thing.

Explaining why the people of Germany elected the Nazi's has absolutely nothing to do with that.

You ignorant twat, I shared the ****ing source.
 
Ukraine was widely considered either hte most corrupt nation in the world or one of the most.

You don't think this corruption was focused on Parliament?

BUT I READ ON WIKIPEDIA THAT THE PARLIMENT WAS PRO-EU!!!!

Imagine living in the US and thinking that a parliamentary body actually represents the will of the people. And this is the 'least corrupt' country on earth (US) versus Ukraine which is considered the most corrupt.

Yes, Parliament overwhelmingly wanted to join. The people ****ing revolted because he backed.

But sure, he was totally a popular President and the citizens were robbed of a presidency by the West....

Dude take a step back. You sound like a Russian bot.

And again I say, if Trump comes out tomorrow and calls Putin a dictator, you'll be on here spewing how Putin is awful and the scum of the Earth.
 
Yes, Parliament overwhelmingly wanted to join. The people ****ing revolted because he backed.

But sure, he was totally a popular President and the citizens were robbed of a presidency by the West....

Dude take a step back. You sound like a Russian bot.

And again I say, if Trump comes out tomorrow and calls Putin a dictator, you'll be on here spewing how Putin is awful and the scum of the Earth.

The 'people' revolted? You mean the color revolution planned by the US?

Can you show me when I said Putin wasn't a dictator? Where I said he was a good guy?

Thats right - you can't so you resort to this because you think you know what happened because you read the wiki page on maidan.

Seems liek the only one wearing rose colored glasses are you in that the US can do no wrong. I however am a realist and understand the people running the west the last few decades were scum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would pause if the foreign policy position I am taking is being shared by the likes of Liz Cheaney / Lindsey Graham / John Bolton / Bush / Obama / Biden - But no, you go ahead and take those positions and think they are the right ones.
 
Seems liek the only one wearing rose colored glasses are you in that the US can do no wrong. I however am a realist and understand the people running the west the last few decades were scum.

Spoken like someone who is getting paid by the russians, while you aren't.
 
Spoken like someone who is getting paid by the russians, while you aren't.

I'm not surprised someone who thought the the CCP virus was naturally occurring or Russiagate was real to think the people running the west the last 30+ years are good people.

HOwd the Iraq/Afghanistan invasions go?
 
I'm not surprised someone who thought the the CCP virus was naturally occurring or Russiagate was real to think the people running the west the last 30+ years are good people.

HOwd the Iraq/Afghanistan invasions go?

Because I don't support Russia, Specifically Putin's Russia I'm pro Iraq/Afghanistan?

You're a broken record, you latch onto something you believe is right and harp on it forever. the Game is tired and old.
 
Because I don't support Russia, Specifically Putin's Russia I'm pro Iraq/Afghanistan?

You're a broken record, you latch onto something you believe is right and harp on it forever. the Game is tired and old.

You said I'm getting paid by the Russians becasue I said the people who have ran the west for 30+ years are bad people. I give examples that shows exactly how terrible the west leadership has been and this is your response?

Got it. You think the West is perfect and therefore a reasonable person would assume that you agree with what was done in these situatinos.
 
You said I'm getting paid by the Russians becasue I said the people who have ran the west for 30+ years are bad people. I give examples that shows exactly how terrible the west leadership has been and this is your response?

Got it. You think the West is perfect and therefore a reasonable person would assume that you agree with what was done in these situatinos.

No you're making false equivalencies. I think Putin is a really bad person. THat's what I said. I can disagree with various choices the US has made. I was harping on reducing defense spending long before it was an idea you even considered. I was against the Iraq war before it was cool.

You're just attempting to win an argument that doesn't need to be won, and simply could be ended by saying "I don't think we need to be involved in the war in Ukraine because while Putin is a cumguzzler, but I don't believe in supporting the lesser of 2 evils and I have issues with how Ukraine is ran as well" Or just the general I don't believe in interventionalism approach but we know that's not true because you want to invade Greenland and Palestine.
 
No you're making false equivalencies. I think Putin is a really bad person. THat's what I said. I can disagree with various choices the US has made. I was harping on reducing defense spending long before it was an idea you even considered. I was against the Iraq war before it was cool.

You're just attempting to win an argument that doesn't need to be won, and simply could be ended by saying "I don't think we need to be involved in the war in Ukraine because while Putin is a cumguzzler, but I don't believe in supporting the lesser of 2 evils and I have issues with how Ukraine is ran as well" Or just the general I don't believe in interventionalism approach but we know that's not true because you want to invade Greenland and Palestine.

I think Putin is a bad man. I think the West are ran by bad people. Apparently, you think the West is good of all a sudden in Ukraine while also being simultaneiously bad the prior 15 years in Iraq/Afghanistan? MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Can you show me where I said I want to invade Palestine?

I certainly want Greenland because it helps counterbalance the Russian navy and provides access to key minerals and shipping routes.
 
I think Putin is a bad man. I think the West are ran by bad people. Apparently, you think the West is good of all a sudden in Ukraine while also being simultaneiously bad the prior 15 years in Iraq/Afghanistan? MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Can you show me where I said I want to invade Palestine?

I certainly want Greenland because it helps counterbalance the Russian navy and provides access to key minerals and shipping routes.

I mean you're allowed to just say **** I never said figured I wcould.

You're basically saying that anyone who thinks Putin started this war, is someone who supports Afghanistan and Iraq, it's so ****ing dumb but you can't see it.
 
I mean you're allowed to just say **** I never said figured I wcould.

You're basically saying that anyone who thinks Putin started this war, is someone who supports Afghanistan and Iraq, it's so ****ing dumb but you can't see it.

No I'm saying you are claiming Putin started this war by ignoring all the west has done. you don't think the West has done anything because you are assuming their innocence. I counter that contention by showing how the West has been bad actors the last 30+ years and now you are trying to backtrack with a circular logic argument because I showed the faultiness in your logic.
 
[tw]1892712629061161095[/tw]

These agencies are going to be remade and focussed on the right things moving forward.

What a term 2.
 
No I'm saying you are claiming Putin started this war by ignoring all the west has done. you don't think the West has done anything because you are assuming their innocence. I counter that contention by showing how the West has been bad actors the last 30+ years and now you are trying to backtrack with a circular logic argument because I showed the faultiness in your logic.

See again, you're blaming "the West" for Putin being a dictator who's trying to restore the Russian Empire. Putin would have justified anything for his invasion. Becuase he's a terrible person. Remember when he killed his own people and blamed it on Chechen Rebels to insure he stayed in office by starting Second Chechen War?

No you didn't show any faultiness in my logic. You think you did. You said Papa Bear Putin was justified to invade Ukraine becasue "the West" because you blame everything bad that happens on "the West" we get it, you like parrotting Russian Propaganda because Daddy DOnnie does. We get it.
 
Back
Top