Second ('Third') Trump Presidency Thread

[tw]1904887948631224721[/tw]

This is so obvious - Of course the Atlantic had to change their wording. That was intentional because they know their characterization was a lie.

The Democrat voters are too stupid to realize though.
 
[tw]1904887094649971146[/tw]

What the left inadvertently did was make Vance look even more appealing to MAGA.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1904887948631224721[/tw]

This is so obvious - Of course the Atlantic had to change their wording. That was intentional because they know their characterization was a lie.

The Democrat voters are too stupid to realize though.
Click to expand...

This is the first time I’ve seen gaslighting so lazy that it makes me question if I’m the crazy one.

We’re just mincing words on attack vs. war and that’s the plan?
 
mqt said:
This is the first time I’ve seen gaslighting so lazy that it makes me question if I’m the crazy one.

We’re just mincing words on attack vs. war and that’s the plan?
Click to expand...

War plans actually puts America and its troops in danger. Pre-meditation gives the enemy a chance to coordinate and counter.

There is a reason the Atlantic changed the wording. We are simply responding to the Atlantic 'mincing words'.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1904887094649971146[/tw]

What the left inadvertently did was make Vance look even more appealing to MAGA.
Click to expand...

Listen I won't poke too much fun over this, but mother****er used his phone editor to underline and did a worse job than I would have. As someone with maybe bottom 5% handwriting skills and a tremor in my right hand from breaking my arm just above my wrist and it not resetting, I woulnd't have posted that ****ed up swoosh with a dot on the A
 
thethe said:
War plans actually puts America and its troops in danger. Pre-meditation gives the enemy a chance to coordinate and counter.

There is a reason the Atlantic changed the wording. We are simply responding to the Atlantic 'mincing words'.
Click to expand...

I'll give a crude football analogy. What happened here is like the play-by-play guy calling the game as it is happening and one of the teams are accusing the announcer of giving out their offensive game plan.
 
Garmel said:
I'll give a crude football analogy. What happened here is like the play-by-play guy calling the game as it is happening and one of the teams are accusing the announcer of giving out their offensive game plan.
Click to expand...

Yup - WAR PLANS!

Again, the Atlantic changed the wording for a reason. The left is so rabid they can't even understand that basic reality.
 
Garmel said:
I'll give a crude football analogy. What happened here is like the play-by-play guy calling the game as it is happening and one of the teams are accusing the announcer of giving out their offensive game plan.
Click to expand...

Does the article suggest these are actually a series of texts? Because the NOW (1144et) thing reads like a summary of what’s about to happen for the following 4 hours?
 
mqt said:
Does the article suggest these are actually a series of texts? Because the NOW (1144et) thing reads like a summary of what’s about to happen for the following 4 hours?
Click to expand...

It could be. If the full release shows some planning was actually detailed then I'll walk back what I've said.

As of now it's a nothingburger because no targets were laid out to see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[tw]1904894654119608332[/tw]

The left needs something because they see what hte future is about to look like for them.

When Nancy/Chuck are out the door the left is in for some serious electoral issues.
 
Garmel said:
It could be. If the full release shows some planning was actually detailed then I'll walk back what I've said.

As of now it's a nothingburger.
Click to expand...

[tw]1904876980496970010[/tw]

Spoiler - There was nothing in there that resembles 'war planning'.
 
[tw]1904877475278057748[/Tw]

This tweet seems to actively lay out what I was saying before: Hegseth provides a timed cadence of what will be happening when, and Vance responds at 12:13 PM praying for a good outcome. How would this information making it to our enemies not put our fighters in jeopardy?!
 
mqt said:
[tw]1904877475278057748[/Tw]

This tweet seems to actively lay out what I was saying before: Hegseth provides a timed cadence of what will be happening when, and Vance responds at 12:13 PM praying for a good outcome. How would this information making it to our enemies not put our fighters in jeopardy?!
Click to expand...

Where was the strike? Where would enemies know were to strike?

What capabilities does this particular enemy have in even impacting this strike?

Again - The Atlantic knew what it was doing with changing their wording.
 
Man what a nothing burger except to find out who and how the journalist got added.

He didn't just "pop on" the text chain
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top