considering the last time the "religious voters" had their way we were thrown into war in the mid east, unfunded war in the mid east, a collapse of our economic system and the legacy of intolerance around the globe.
And witness this time "religious voters" got their candidate.
Track record doesn't look too good.
What is lost in your conversation Bedell is the majority of Americans disagree with the path of the "religious voters"
Why would Democrats even consider pandering to "religious voters". Or frame their argument so as to attract that niche constituency ?
My thinking is they (Democrats) garner more votes by pointing out the bigotry,hypocrisy and my way or the hiway 18th century thinking that proves daily the growing irrelevance of the "religious voters" class..
Supposing Lincolns second inaugural as a model for (R) where does that stand next to Puerto Rico ,Flint,guns civil rights.
I don't understand why " religious voters " don't run away from (R) as fast as they can.
................
Oh yeah, that
Where a man widely known to chase teenage age girls while in his 30's is preferrable to one that stands up for law but has a different political view on when life starts and the decisions young women make.
and, who gets to make decisions for said young women
.............