MadduxFanII
Swallowed by Mark Bowman
I kind of wonder if this is more a Kenley preference and Snitker is just taking the bullet for it.
I kind of wonder if this is more a Kenley preference and Snitker is just taking the bullet for it.
I kind of wonder if this is more a Kenley preference and Snitker is just taking the bullet for it.
It's probably illustrative to look at the win probabilities when certain moves were made instead of whatever people think they saw based on a late comeback vs a mop up pitcher...
Bottom 7
Grossman 3 run bomb: 27% win prob
Acuna walks: 29.9% win prob
Acuna once again wastes a baserunner by trying to steal: 24.7% win prob
Top 8
At this point the Braves have a 1 in 4 chance of winning this game. Snit brings in Lee to face 2 LHH. I have no problem with this move.
Lee retires Mccann: 29.7% win prob
Bottom 8
Diaz comes in and predictably shuts the Braves down. "Momentum" stopped.
Diaz retires Olson: 15.8% win prob
Top 9
The Braves have a 1 in 6 chance on paper of winning this game, but realistically much worse considering Diaz is coming out for the bottom of the 9th and will most likely completely shut the Braves offense down again.
Stephens and Tarnok then effectively ended the game.
Bottom 9
Mets understand they are 99.4% favorites to win this game, so they bring in a lower leverage arm, as they should have.
A bit of life from the Braves: 10.3% win prob
Acuna's fly caught, game voer.
At no point was there a BP choice to be made when the win prob was better than 1 in 4. Folks may like to talk about momentum, but Diaz shut down any momentum the Braves may have had, and he was going to shut them down in the 9th if required.
It's probably illustrative to look at the win probabilities when certain moves were made instead of whatever people think they saw based on a late comeback vs a mop up pitcher...
Bottom 7
Grossman 3 run bomb: 27% win prob
Acuna walks: 29.9% win prob
Acuna once again wastes a baserunner by trying to steal: 24.7% win prob
Top 8
At this point the Braves have a 1 in 4 chance of winning this game. Snit brings in Lee to face 2 LHH. I have no problem with this move.
Lee retires Mccann: 29.7% win prob
Bottom 8
Diaz comes in and predictably shuts the Braves down. "Momentum" stopped.
Diaz retires Olson: 15.8% win prob
Top 9
The Braves have a 1 in 6 chance on paper of winning this game, but realistically much worse considering Diaz is coming out for the bottom of the 9th and will most likely completely shut the Braves offense down again.
Stephens and Tarnok then effectively ended the game.
Bottom 9
Mets understand they are 99.4% favorites to win this game, so they bring in a lower leverage arm, as they should have.
A bit of life from the Braves: 10.3% win prob
Acuna's fly caught, game voer.
At no point was there a BP choice to be made when the win prob was better than 1 in 4. Folks may like to talk about momentum, but Diaz shut down any momentum the Braves may have had, and he was going to shut them down in the 9th if required.
Jansen, Minter, or Iglesias should have been in there instead of Jackson. That was an important game and one we had momentum going at the time.
yeah F walt weiss too
One point that's been completely left out of this discussion so far...
Snitker wasn't even in the dugout during the late innings - none of those moves were his call. He was thrown out in the 4th before Odorizzi was even taken out.
I'm one of the last people to ever defend the way he handles pen decisions, but *amn - y'all even want to criticize him for the ones he DIDN'T have a say in.
Just sayin'.
Are you saying that a shift in probability from 16% to 0.6% isn’t a significant decrease?
That’s not even getting into the fact that forcing Diaz to pitch another inning helps the Braves chances the next day.
I didn’t say that at all.
What I said was that using your best BP arms when you have a 16% chance to win isn’t the obvious call many of you are claiming it is.
I’m also saying that relying on things like “momentum” is a very dinosaur way of managing a game, especially when Diaz is a momentum destroyer.
I’ll also say that somehow burning a well rested Diaz because he had to throw 12 more pitches to easily retire the bottom of the order is a pretty weak reason to burn your own high leverage guys.
In a playoff game where I want to capitalize on a 16% chance to win a game, sure. On a regular season game? It’s not such a definite yes.
I didn’t say that at all.
What I said was that using your best BP arms when you have a 16% chance to win isn’t the obvious call many of you are claiming it is.
I’m also saying that relying on things like “momentum” is a very dinosaur way of managing a game, especially when Diaz is a momentum destroyer.
I’ll also say that somehow burning a well rested Diaz because he had to throw 12 more pitches to easily retire the bottom of the order is a pretty weak reason to burn your own high leverage guys.
In a playoff game where I want to capitalize on a 16% chance to win a game, sure. On a regular season game? It’s not such a definite yes.
One point that's been completely left out of this discussion so far...
Snitker wasn't even in the dugout during the late innings - none of those moves were his call. He was thrown out in the 4th before Odorizzi was even taken out.
I'm one of the last people to ever defend the way he handles pen decisions, but *amn - y'all even want to criticize him for the ones he DIDN'T have a say in.
Just sayin'.