I suspect the root cause of the difference is poverty. Straight out poverty.
Of course, low levels of educational attainment contribute to poverty. I know that's a controversial view around here. But I'm gonna keep climbing out on that limb.
The really shocking thang about blue-red divergences is not that they exist. But that they seem to be widening. Across quite a lot of these basic measures of societal health.
Btw I'm not entirely kidding when I say migration from blue states to red states widens the differentials.
Maryland manages quite well thank you. Highly educated. High income. High African American share of population. Not anywhere near the murder rate you see in some red states.
I'm sorry if this thread bothers you.
eh...you pretty ignorant about the fact that W Virginia and Kentucky are pretty low as far as African American population shares...as a matter of fact Massachusetts and Maryland (just to pick two states with much higher levels of educational attainment) have a higher proportion of African Americans than W Virginia
so maybe before you suggest to someone that demographics might explain something you might want to you know actually bother to research the numbers
or perhaps ignorance is a more comfortable place to reside
He's trolling.
if the blue state people are better across the boards and migrating to the red states why is the red/blue state differential getting worse?
Picked rural Appalachia- one of the lowest resourced and poorest areas of the nation. Now do Ole Miss, La and Ark and be honest
it's a math question
take it as a challenge to figure it out
It can't be due to that we're getting your scrubs. Lotsa white collar people are coming to the south.
I wouldn't think many poor people can move several states over.
Maryland is 8th in murder rate...
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/murder-rate-by-state
It can't be due to that we're getting your scrubs. Lotsa white collar people are coming to the south.
" Policy on matters like healthcare and education."
keeps coming back to that doesn't it ?
https://reason.com/2024/02/28/why-is-panera-exempted-from-californias-new-minimum-wage-law/
When fast food restaurants across California have to start paying workers $20 per hour on April 1, one major chain will be exempted from the mandate—and it just so happens to have a connection to a longtime friend and donor to Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Panera Bread is poised to get a boost from a bizarre clause in the fast-food minimum wage law that exempts "chains that bake bread and sell it as a standalone item," Bloomberg reports, adding that "Newsom pushed for that break, according to people familiar with the matter."
That exemption stands to benefit Greg Flynn, owner and CEO of the Flynn Restaurant Group, a conglomerate that operates more than 2,300 restaurants nationally and is the second-largest Panera franchisee in the world, according to the company's website. Flynn and Newsom go way back: Bloomberg reports that the two attended the same high school at the same time—Flynn was student body president during Newsom's freshman year—and the restauranteur has donated to Newsom's gubernatorial campaigns and bragged to colleagues about his close relationship with the governor.
What is confusing?
Places that make bread simply do not need to pay a living wage