Some Red State/Blue State Indicia

Part time workers often get fired for their attendance when they do this.


There’s a lot of parents out there that will absolutely use their child in this capacity.
What is your policy towards 14 and 15 year olds in the workforce and how does the Florida bill contradict that?

So far all you’ve communicated is hysterics how Dollar General (in collusion with parents) is going to work them overtime as shift managers and fire them if they refuse.
 
What is your policy towards 14 and 15 year olds in the workforce and how does the Florida bill contradict that?

So far all you’ve communicated is hysterics how Dollar General (in collusion with parents) is going to work them overtime as shift managers and fire them if they refuse.
My policy would be:

Workers under 18 are subject to the same minimum wage as workers 18 and older unless their employment meets some strictly established criteria such as working less than 10 hours per week and/or during the hours that align with prioritizing their education as we currently have in most states. I’d also be fine with certain exemptions for parents employing their children in their small business.

What my policy would not include is provisions to make youth workers artificially less expensive than their slightly older counterparts. The whole point is that these are kids that aren’t as valuable to an employer and thus the government needs to incentivize their employment by making it cheaper. But if you get rid of the other guardrails such as hours limits or scheduling restrictions for these employees, it’s just a financial gift to employers. Do some of those employers need them? Yes. But I’d favor any legislation to have some sort of upper bound for number of employees or annual revenues to ensure companies like Dollar General or fast food corporations can’t use this to decrease operational payroll expenses by taking advantage of hard-working minors. Any time you adjust the minimum down for a group, large companies will always adjust their practices to better exploit that labor.

This isn’t so much a pro-minimum wage argument or even an argument against youths in the workforce. It’s the targeted reduction of wages paired with policies designed to increase the amount of hours spent on these reduced wages.
 

I understand that there’s a valid legal argument for this, but there absolutely shouldn’t be and even if it’s for feeding kids and kind of very funny, Evers shouldn’t have done this.
Im not sure why it's legal or even ethical to commit people who aren't born yet to funding something.

Then again we do that every day by running $2T deficits. Our future children have no say in the matter. Taxation without representation at its finest
 
Back
Top