Some Red State/Blue State Indicia

Economic outcomes​


Recent work consistently shows that states/regions with faster growth in college-educated shares (bachelor’s or higher among adults 25+) experience stronger income growth, GDP gains, innovation, and reduced inequality—while “brain drain” areas lag. Key mechanisms include higher local productivity, attraction of high-skill jobs, and spillovers to non-college workers.


  • A 2023 Urban Institute analysis of state economic performance since 1970 finds that educational attainment is the single strongest predictor of long-run median income growth. States with larger gains in college shares saw the biggest inflation-adjusted income increases; the authors note this reflects both direct effects (higher-earning residents) and indirect ones (job markets pulling in more educated migrants).
  • Analyses of long-run regional inequalities (e.g., 2021 work on U.S. economic development) highlight that human capital divergence—now tied to tech/service sectors rather than manufacturing—explains much of the gap in per capita income across states. College attainment shares vary dramatically (e.g., >20% in New England vs. ~10% in parts of Appalachia), driving persistent divides in growth.
  • Brain-drain/gain studies quantify costs and benefits: A 2025 Common Sense Institute report on Iowa estimated a $96 billion cumulative earnings loss from out-migration of public university graduates over two decades, with ripple effects on state GDP (potentially $7 billion higher annually with better retention). Similar dynamics appear in broader JEC and Upjohn Institute work on skilled migration.

Health outcomes​


Divergence in college attainment has also widened geographic and individual health gaps, especially via mortality, life expectancy, and behaviors (smoking, obesity). College-educated populations create positive spillovers for entire communities.


  • NBER working paper (2024) by Bor et al. (“Human Capital Spillovers and Health”) finds that every 10 percentage-point increase in an area’s share of college-educated adults is associated with a 7% decline in all-cause mortality, even after controlling for individual education. The effect has strengthened since 1990, driven by lower smoking and obesity rates in high-attainment areas (via norms, information, and healthier environments). Spatial sorting of sicker people does not explain this—it's genuine spillover.
  • Updates to Case-Deaton research (2024 paper on education, health-based selection, and the widening mortality gap) document that the life expectancy gap between those with vs. without a college degree grew from ~2.6 years (1992) to 6–8+ years by the early 2020s. This divergence interacts with geography: Non-college mortality has stagnated or risen in lower-attainment regions, while college graduates see steady gains almost everywhere.
  • Related 2026 NBER digest work on midlife mortality shows geographic divergence in death rates (rural vs. urban, by education) is largely explained by smoking patterns, which track college attainment levels. College-heavy areas have converged on low mortality; non-college areas have diverged sharply.

Broader reviews (e.g., 2024 Annual Review of Sociology on widening educational disparities in health/longevity) confirm these patterns hold across causes of death and have accelerated in recent decades.


Overall takeaways and links to state divergence​


These papers emphasize feedback loops: Migration-driven brain gain raises local college shares → better economic opportunities + healthier behaviors → further attraction of talent (and better outcomes for everyone). Conversely, brain-drain states see slower economic growth and worsening relative health, compounding inequality.
 
Having large economic zones that were established a century ago in major populated cities is not some sort of achievement of competent government policy of 2026.

However hundreds of companies and trillions in wealth fleeing those established economic zones certainly is reflective of government policy of 2026
 
Having large economic zones that were established a century ago in major populated cities is not some sort of achievement of competent government policy of 2026.

However hundreds of companies and trillions in wealth fleeing those established economic zones certainly is reflective of government policy of 2026
You might have a point if not for the recent widening of these gaps on income, educational attainment, and health outcomes. Maybe it's just luck.
 
Do you leftists care? Do you care about the obvious theft so blatantly in front of your eyes?

If you think this is a good idea, do you care that its gonna take them 3 years instead of 3 months?

Its so weird to me that yall couldnt care less about such blatant fraud

Nick Davidov is being obtuse and misleading.

Not in a million years would they ever “ask for more”. They will just take it
 
Well you see... the reason the communists budget is for 10x the cost of a normal heatpump with install is because...

Well, we all get it by now i hope.

Good for those gdp per capita numbers though. 10x what it wouod otherwise produce!!

Where can you get a heatpump install for 5K? You can't even buy a decent heat pump for under 3K

Keep in mind this is the entirety of the project including labor, storage, disposal etc.

Also you don't know what kind of work needs to happen at the residences. is it ducted, is it ductless? Those are different projects as the ductless requires some new heads which also aren't cheap.

For example, a 24000 BTW Mitsubisihi pump and head is like 2500. that's enough for 1000-1500 sq feet (allegedly) but you still need to buy refridgerant line and that probalby is a few hundred bucks, it needs a mount, ideally it would be mounted on a pad but I assume we're going wall mount. that's probably a hundred bucks for a respectable wall mount, the heat pump has a special install kit for it's breaker box (you make a sub panel on your panel) and you may need thermostats lets say those are 50 bucks. You're already creeped up to around 3K in stritcly material cost. Then again unless you're replacing existing you have to then run electrical, lets say the average line length is 20 feet. Assuming it's a 230 volt, assuming 10/2 wire is fine that's well over a dollar a foot when you buy a huge amount for the cheapest option. So you're adding at least another say 25 bucks for wiring, a 20 amp 240 dual pole GFCI breaker will set you back another 130 bucks (I assume they're using GFCI because of fear of code) so 150 minimum in electrical work.

So yeah for a solid setup you're probably looking just over 3K for a new ductless. But then you have labor. Running electrical like that probably is a few K (find a good electrician who will do that for less if you can, I'm sure it doesn't happen, you'd probably get the retard who did my house's electrical and connected 8 kitchen outlets all in line, all on GFCI. So yeah if I run my toaster and tea kettle at the same time I can trip the baker.

Anyway this is a long way to go to get that I believe the average labor cost for a mini split that's not just a single is 10K For a single I think it's 5K. Yeah 53K is a lot. But that again, this factors in costs of disposal, waste, storage, and the issue of working in NYC and it's unique issues.
 
Where can you get a heatpump install for 5K? You can't even buy a decent heat pump for under 3K

Keep in mind this is the entirety of the project including labor, storage, disposal etc.

Also you don't know what kind of work needs to happen at the residences. is it ducted, is it ductless? Those are different projects as the ductless requires some new heads which also aren't cheap.

For example, a 24000 BTW Mitsubisihi pump and head is like 2500. that's enough for 1000-1500 sq feet (allegedly) but you still need to buy refridgerant line and that probalby is a few hundred bucks, it needs a mount, ideally it would be mounted on a pad but I assume we're going wall mount. that's probably a hundred bucks for a respectable wall mount, the heat pump has a special install kit for it's breaker box (you make a sub panel on your panel) and you may need thermostats lets say those are 50 bucks. You're already creeped up to around 3K in stritcly material cost. Then again unless you're replacing existing you have to then run electrical, lets say the average line length is 20 feet. Assuming it's a 230 volt, assuming 10/2 wire is fine that's well over a dollar a foot when you buy a huge amount for the cheapest option. So you're adding at least another say 25 bucks for wiring, a 20 amp 240 dual pole GFCI breaker will set you back another 130 bucks (I assume they're using GFCI because of fear of code) so 150 minimum in electrical work.

So yeah for a solid setup you're probably looking just over 3K for a new ductless. But then you have labor. Running electrical like that probably is a few K (find a good electrician who will do that for less if you can, I'm sure it doesn't happen, you'd probably get the retard who did my house's electrical and connected 8 kitchen outlets all in line, all on GFCI. So yeah if I run my toaster and tea kettle at the same time I can trip the baker.

Anyway this is a long way to go to get that I believe the average labor cost for a mini split that's not just a single is 10K For a single I think it's 5K. Yeah 53K is a lot. But that again, this factors in costs of disposal, waste, storage, and the issue of working in NYC and it's unique issues.
LOL this is like when you were saying the tax payer getting a bargain on the $50K internet installs per house
 
HGBN8dfX0AA76eJ
 
Adjusted for PPP, UK per capita GDP was 77% of the US level in 1990.

Now it is 71%, reflecting faster growth in the US. Per capita GDP has increased 276% in the US since 1990 and 246% in the UK. We have a pretty good economic performance since 1990. In the space of less than two generations material well-being has more than tripled. It has more than tripled in the UK too. It has been a period of remarkable economic growth, led by a handful of amazing companies: Microsoft, Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceX.
 
Back
Top