I hadn’t seen these developments before the passage of the bill, but it really takes a big bite out of the argument that the bill is just about stopping sex talk amongst children:
These interpretations are wrong. The bill does not prohibit instruction on sex, sexualization, or “sex-stuff,” but rather expicitly targets “sexual orientation” and “gender identity,” which are a separate set of concepts. This distinction is vital. For instance, there is nothing in the legislative text to prevent a teacher from describing to first graders the act of masturbation, human genitalia, or potentially even sexual intercourse. However, teachers might well be prohibited from reading a book about an LGBTQ+ character.
This is clearly the bill’s intent. How do we know? First, because its sponsors have told us so. Republican State Sen. Dennis Baxley, who sponsored the bill in the Florida senate, explicitly confirmed that HB 1557 was designed to keep assignments with details like “Sally has two moms or Johnny has two dads” out of the classroom. And second, because every time somebody offered alternative language, the bill’s supporters shot them down. For instance, one state senator proposed an amendment to replace the phrase “sexual orientation or gender identity” with “human sexuality or sexual activity.” Sen. Baxley rejected his proposal, explaining that such a change would “significantly gut” the bill’s intent.
https://pen.org/these-4-florida-bills-censor-classroom-subjects-and-ideas/
Because the Bill doesn't need to specify it because us 'normal' people aren't trying to sexualize children.
I love that your side continues to push this though. This strategy is going to work out well for MAGA.
Last edited: