Sorry, my sarcasm detector is faulty.
Is this real? How do exit velocities with college bats compare to wood?
yep, it's real.
link: https://twitter.com/FOXSportsBraves/status/1271236475372404738?s=20
no clue how they compare tho
Sorry, my sarcasm detector is faulty.
Is this real? How do exit velocities with college bats compare to wood?
It’s like they had the same strategy as last year but forgot they didn’t have the extra rounds for high school guys.
I am wondering given the tilt toward high-ceiling high school guys last draft that they were looking for guys that they could sandwich between the players in the developmental stage (Backstrom, Morton, Grissom, Paolini, Johnson, Owens, Estes) and the players nearer to the majors.
It reminds me a bit of the DeMacio drafts. If I had to choose a pick that I like best, it would be Franklin, but there are flags there as well. I think the other guys make sense given where they were drafted and the fourth-round pick to save money. My guess the ducks are in a row, but one can never tell. Like others, the Elder pick isn't making a huge ton of sense to me in terms of having to go well over slot to sign him. We'll have to see what the fourth-round guy settles at to know how much will be left on the table.
I am wondering given the tilt toward high-ceiling high school guys last draft that they were looking for guys that they could sandwich between the players in the developmental stage (Backstrom, Morton, Grissom, Paolini, Johnson, Owens, Estes) and the players nearer to the majors. Of course, with no minor league baseball this season and probable contraction of teams, who knows if there is any strategy to any of this by any franchise.
Interesting draft if a bit disappointing. I thought they would at least go after one high school guy with a perceived high ceiling. My choice in that respect was 3B Coby Mayo out of Stoneman Douglas High School (FL) who was drafted by the Orioles early in the 4th round. University of Florida commit, so he may have been out of the Braves' price range given the size of the pool.
I think they did they did ok. Many of their targets were off the board before our late pick came.
It was a tough draft with all our limitations and they didn’t get any luck either. So..it is what it is. Maybe a couple of these guys hit.
don't forget Michael Harris!
"OK" is probably the term for this draft, but I think it's on the short side of that.
I don't think you can call a 4 round draft that produces two guys with legitimate shots to pitch in the back-end of a rotation in relatively short order AND a 4th OF with some pop that has a legitimate shot at becoming an everyday guy if things come together "bad" by any stretch, but I keep going back to questioning the strategy involved. If the goal was to start trying to restock the lower levels, why spend the most money on two college SPs that you expect to move relatively fast that won't need much time there?
Like others, I'm not saying a boring (and safe) draft is necessarily a bad way to go given the circumstances this year, but it's certainly uninspiring to say the least. Assuming we go nuts trying to sign a ton of NDFAs (as expected) we won't necessarily have lots of trouble filling out the rosters at the lower levels, but it just feels like the number of kids with any type of significant upside or ceiling didn't increase at all.
Law's take...
Atlanta Braves
Atlanta led off its draft with Wake Forest lefty Jared Shuster (1), a fastball/changeup guy up to 94 mph with good deception in his delivery. He started throwing more strikes this spring, which gives him fourth-starter potential. Jesse Franklin (3) didn’t play this spring after breaking his collarbone while skiing in the winter, so his last look for scouts was hitting .262/.388/.477 last spring for Michigan and a mediocre showing on the Cape. He has some power but strikes out a lot and as a 40 runner is probably limited to left field. Clemson right-hander Spencer Strider (4) returned this year as a starter after missing 2019 due to Tommy John surgery. He’s been up to 97 mph with good characteristics on the fastball, but the breaking ball needs work. He has a chance to start, as does Texas right-hander Bryce Elder (5), a strongly built pitcher with a high arm slot who has nothing plus but throws strikes with all of his offerings.
Yeah, read Law’s take on all teams. Pretty useless fluff piece. Doesn’t really say anything about his feelings on how teams did, just gives 1-2 sentences on each player (mainly taken verbatim from his pre draft write ups). Grow some balls Law and give letter grades.
It's really difficult to put a letter grade on one-eighth of a regulation draft. It would be like posting final grades after the first quiz, but I get your point. Just looking at it and having followed it only intermittently, I would say the Orioles, Tigers, and Cardinals did the best (Cardinals aren't mentioned by most observers as having done that well, but they got two really top-notch high school players with their first two picks). The thing that struck me about Law's piece is that he didn't have a whole lot of positive things to say about a lot of the guys who were drafted.