You’ve got a bowl of skittles.....
Using the “rich [white ~ added for your true intent] man” correlation is just a cop out. Criminality percentages tell a story regardless if you think it’s racist to say so.
Crime has skyrocketed all across the nation and that’s becUse criminals know we are soft.
For someone who so frequently accuses the left of invoking face unnecessarily, you seem to fairly often insert it where it wasn’t needed. This is a class issue, not a racial one. If non-white people are affected at a greater rate, it’s due more in part to other factors.
As for why this argument is silly, some of it is fairly obvious. Rich people are bound to commit less crime, in large part because of three issues.
First, there’s an entire subsection of common crimes that rich people simply won’t partake in unless they’re crazy or a mob boss. Things like petty theft or selling drugs are going to be done predominantly by poor people because those are the people that need money. Even in the case of a major drug operation where some rich people might be involved, there are likely many more poor people involved in the operation.
Second, the system we use allows for rich people to afford the types of attorneys that take the same crime that was committed and turn it into a not guilty verdict or a plea to a lesser offense on their own terms. This simply isn’t the case with poor people, who end up more likely to be branded a criminal for the same offense, which leads to difficulties in finding employment and other services and perpetuates the cycle.
Third, the system is designed to get people to accept a punishment and move on, whether or not they committed a crime. By having a cash bail system that cannot be afforded, people get desperate and accept whatever plea is offered. This is why the reduction or elimination of cash bail is so important. Yes, some people did what they were accused of, but others didn’t and just cannot afford to sit in jail.