The Biden Presidency

But you do. And you do so quite often.

I don't - I say Trump has been a great president and leader but from a personal perspective I've never said such a thing. The furthest I've gone is that Trump is a great father/grand father and the way his kids turned out proves it.
 
Speaking of being able to relay your message effectively, if Tulsi registers as a Republican at any point over the next 4 years, she would immediately vault to the top of candidates. She is legit one of the best public speakers in politics. I don't think she was ever a serious candidate for VP for Trump, but I would have welcomed her with open arms.
 
Speaking of being able to relay your message effectively, if Tulsi registers as a Republican at any point over the next 4 years, she would immediately vault to the top of candidates. She is legit one of the best public speakers in politics. I don't think she was ever a serious candidate for VP for Trump, but I would have welcomed her with open arms.

I love her as an authentic person. I don't love some of her positions, but as a person and a REAL American shes 100%. Probably the best democrat of the last 20 years and they ran her out on rails.
 
I love her as an authentic person. I don't love some of her positions, but as a person and a REAL American shes 100%. Probably the best democrat of the last 20 years and they ran her out on rails.

Her positions have changed the past few years as well and I expect a further evolution of those views.

Going to have an amazing future.
 
Her positions have changed the past few years as well and I expect a further evolution of those views.

Going to have an amazing future.

Whats funny is she wouldn't play ball with the establishment Dems and they literally ran her out without a second thought.

Shes a very authentic and selfless person, even though Hillary called her a Russian asset and she would never tell a lie!
 
(D) wants to simultaneously promote the virtues of DEI while insisting they never actually use it to make a decision

This is a valid criticism and I do believe there are many people who look at diversity as some sort of nebulous thing you just have because that’s what you’re supposed to have rather than for a specific reason.
 
This is a valid criticism and I do believe there are many people who look at diversity as some sort of nebulous thing you just have because that’s what you’re supposed to have rather than for a specific reason.

And that policy would be wrong?
 
It says in the article that current DOJ were involved.

It sure does. And the media gets thangs wrong sometimes. It is important to be skeptical and check thangs out. Even when we like the story! Or perhaps especially when we like the story!
 
It could be wrong being the MSM of course.

I linked the document. The signatories give their dates of service. I don't see anyone currently at the DoJ. One guy is running for a local office this year, so it says nominee (2024) under his name. But he isn't a nominee to a position at the DoJ. Another guy is currently attorney general of Rhode Island, not a current DoJ official. It just seems kind of sloppy of the Hill.
 
And all the blue checkmarks being useful idiots in the comments.

It would be scandalous if it were true. I'm guessing the people who wrote and edited this piece at the Hill don't have much experience on the job. It would be a very big deal if what they wrote was true. Such a big deal that an experienced editor would have double-checked something like that.
 
Back
Top