Getting us back to norms, right nsacpi?
[Tw]1380536703866245132[/tw]
Behind the paywall.
Tell me the summary and how looking into expanding the court is a norm that the old lecturer is supportive of
well if you set up a gofundme page i'll think about chippin' in deux sous into the sturg educational and enlightenment project...many people tell me it's a good cause...many
Would have been really cool if the public could have gotten a single foreign policy question in the two debates.
Instead we had to hear about imaginary white supremacy for 20th time
[Tw]1380542399730966530[/tw]
After the responses to Kavanaugh and ACB, I'm trying to imagine the response if imaginary fascist Trump decided to try to expand the size of the court to get more of his kind on there.
I'm sure it would have been well receptor by the principled norms wanting lecturers
I imagine the response would be the same as how Republicans would have reacted if Hillary won in 2016 but lost the popular vote by 3 million and expanded the court. "Full blown tyranny" is what I would expect Moscow Mitch to call it.
I don't think Biden has the balls to add justices. What I support is either setting the number at 9 in stone as well as the process and timeline for confirming justices or else go ahead and expand it. I dont Republicans to not expand the court the next time they have the Presidency and Senate. Adding a justice should require a 2/3rds majority of Congress which neither side will ever get, if Republicans oppose that they are telegraphing that they want to do it in the future. The honor system went out the door a while ago.