The Biden Presidency

[Garmel]

The FBI didnt charge this guy. David Weiss did. You can be mad at him all you want about the immunity deal but it got a guilty plea when theres no guarantee he will be convicted if it goes to trial. His immunity deal was because of people who have publicly advocated for politically prosecuting for being Joe Bidens son. David Weiss was a US attorney appointed by Trump who he has praised as "sharing his vision for making America Great Again".

That's what I just said. David Weiss has been hired by many other administrations left or right. He's hardly MAGA. That immunity deal was so insane the judge said she has never seen something like it before and she stopped it.

 

[Garmel]

1. Thats why we have trials. David Weiss was a US attorney appointed by Trump who he heaped praise upon. The immunity deal was because of threats of future political prosecution of Hunter for being the son of a prominent Democrat.

2. Steele didnt lie. He provided raw intelligence some of which has been verified and other parts havent. As opposed to Smirnov who told verifiable lies like he met with Burisma executives in 2015 and 2016 when it was actually 2017 long after Joe Biden had left office.

3. Funny how you believed everything coming for the Durham witch hunt despite the gaping holes in his indictments.

Durham case had no gaping holes. The Sussman case had the evidence on paper that he lied and he billed Hillary for his services so he did represent her. Impossible to get more airtight than that.

 

[cajunrevenge]

How many other cases of the sitting Presidents son being politically prosecuted has there been?

 

[cajunrevenge]

Durham case had no gaping holes. The Sussman case had the evidence on paper that he lied and he billed Hillary for his services so he did represent her. Impossible to get more airtight than that.

Gaping holes like emails from the Hillary campaign specifically telling Sussman they didnt want to take the information to the FBI because they considered them biased against her. Hard to be there on behalf of the Hillary campaign when they specifically told him not to do it. Thats a gaping hole you can drive a truck through.

 

[Garmel]

Gaping holes like emails from the Hillary campaign specifically telling Sussman they didnt want to take the information to the FBI because they considered them biased against her. Hard to be there on behalf of the Hillary campaign when they specifically told him not to do it. Thats a gaping hole you can drive a truck through.

The fact that he billed her says that either that's not true or that they changed their mind.

 

[Garmel]

How many other cases of the sitting Presidents son being politically prosecuted has there been?

How many judges have said an immunity deal was nuts and wouldn't let the DOJ get away with it.

 

[cajunrevenge]

How many judge says this immunity deal was nuts and she would let the DOJ get away with it.

Lets be clear she faced a lot of pressure from the side that appointed her. If she let the plea deal go through she could forget about every getting appointed to a higher court. So lets not pretend she did this independently.

 

[cajunrevenge]

The fact that he billed her says that either that's not true or that they changed their mind.

You can think it all you want, criminal convictions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[Garmel]

SMDH

 

[Garmel]

You can think it all you want, criminal convictions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

And we had it. Evidence in hand with a bill to Hillary. All your stuff doesn't change the fact he billed her.

 

[cajunrevenge]

Should have charged him with defrauding Hillary then. He had a better case for that.

 

[Garmel]

Should have charged him with defrauding Hillary then. He had a better case for that.

Did Hillary charge him? Nope. Kinda tells you she agreed with it.

 

[cajunrevenge]

For starters she doesnt have the power to criminally prosecute him and second it would cost her more money to sue him than he charged her. So your question amounts to why didnt she spend 100 times the money Sussman charged her to spite him.

 

[Garmel]

I highly doubt that. Gee, she didn't have him charged and we never heard another word about it. Sounds like to me she was for it.

Like I said it sounds like whatever plans you mentioned had changed.

 

[cajunrevenge]

You are free to think whatever you want, unfortunately what you want to believe doesnt prove anything in a court of law.

 

[Garmel]

I know that Sussman lied and billed Hillary for going to the FBI. That shows Hillary was for it. What you keep saying about the e-mails just doesn't match her actions. Your "he defrauded her" is backed up with nothing.

 

[Garmel]

1. Thats why we have trials. David Weiss was a US attorney appointed by Trump who he heaped praise upon. The immunity deal was because of threats of future political prosecution of Hunter for being the son of a prominent Democrat.

2. Steele didnt lie. He provided raw intelligence some of which has been verified and other parts havent. As opposed to Smirnov who told verifiable lies like he met with Burisma executives in 2015 and 2016 when it was actually 2017 long after Joe Biden had left office.

3. Funny how you believed everything coming for the Durham witch hunt despite the gaping holes in his indictments.

Steele lied.

[tw]1758640849435652329[/tw]

 

[sturg33]

Cajuns descent into a complete government cuck is one or the saddest outcomes of the Trump area.

 

[Garmel]

Cajuns descent into a complete government cuck is one or the saddest outcomes of the Trump area.

That's only if conservatives are involved. If liberals are involved he does a 180.

 

[cajunrevenge]

Steele lied.

[tw]1758640849435652329[/tw]

What was the lie, that he didn't give the dossier to the media? The FBI didn't prosecute either, David Weiss prosecuted Smirnov. The FBI wasn't going to prosecute him despite knowing he was lying. Smirnov lied about the principle allegations.