The literal definition of bipartisan:
"involving the agreement or cooperation of two political parties that usually oppose each other's policies."
The word that guy is thinking of is "popular."
[tw]1371302784126042113[/tw]
Go woke. Lose your country.
The literal definition of bipartisan:
"involving the agreement or cooperation of two political parties that usually oppose each other's policies."
The word that guy is thinking of is "popular."
Go woke. Lose your country.
Kind of misleading there. The war game isn't a Chinese attempt to invade the US or anything. It's playing scenarios where China attempts to take Taiwan. Losing would be China occupies Taiwan. Our goal is to have our military ready to stop such an attempt.
If China did occupy Taiwan, there would be a lot of questions on where things go from there. Taking something and holding it are two entirely different things. I'm not sure China could cope with a prolonged war with the US. American naval and air dominance would be difficult for China to deal with and would make holding Taiwan extremely difficult. That would be coupled with crippling economic sanctions from not just the US but the entire western world.
While I agree the US military needs to evolve further away from a cold war mentality and towards a new, more flexible approach, there's a big difference between being unable to stop an invasion of Taiwan and not being able to beat China in a conventional war.
Under tyrant Biden, the Capitol city is under military occupation. The military publicly criticized Tucker Carlson bc he offended them. And today they harrased a GOP congresswoman bc she offended them.
This is not good.
But the useful idiots will cheer it on, I'm certain
[Tw]1371612089513545742[/tw]
While less common, over a quarter of major city law enforcement agencies (29%) reported situations with participants that were paid to partake in the protest.
man, i really hate actually reading the **** you two link
nearly every single time, it comes nowhere near the level or completely refutes the point you are trying to hope it makes
that is the exact quote and only mention of this in the whole report
no details or anything and to say the source material is bias is an understatement lol
i'll never get back my time from reading that
perhaps we are watching in real time the evolution of the definition of "bipartisan"
In the gerrymandered world we live in old notions of "bipartisan" have lost all meaning
Was I think the writers point.
Lol You’re so pathetic lol
Losing any battle to any adversary represents a massive threat. We have survived based on the fact that we deter all others from trying anything. Once that wanes it’s the beginning of the end.
But the real threat is ticker Carlson.