The Biden Presidency

msstate7 said:
So my nephew (14 years old) that was born at 6 months wasn't a human? Guess he transitioned to one somewhere along the way
Click to expand...

He without a doubt did

Just like all of us

This ain’t a controversial statement and y’all are freaking out about

Hey y’all, a caterpillar isn’t a butterfly either y’all lol
 
goldfly said:
You just humanized chimps it seems
Click to expand...


If a woman has chimp growing in her body, I may reassess. Until that happens, the living being growing in her body is a human.

Now it's your turn... when is it no longer acceptable to you to abort the pregnancy?

(this is the part...)
 
sturg33 said:
I once again ask when goldy would no longer support aborting the pregnancy

(this is the part - for the third time - he won't answer)
Click to expand...

Just like literally every other time we have talked about this

I am not a doctor and here to tell someone what medical procedures can or should be done

But you’ll freak out about that, like every other time I’ve answered it that way, and being irrational with it

And then claim some crazy stance from it

Then we will circle back to “won’t answer it”

For someone that talks about predictable responses. You’re a rinse and repeat poster lol
 
Did she just imply that men CANNOT get pregnant????

Oh man the trans community and ALCU are not gonna be happy about this

[Tw]1433501414131748869[/tw]
 
sturg33 said:
If a woman has chimp growing in her body, I may reassess. Until that happens, the living being growing in her body is a human.

Now it's your turn... when is it no longer acceptable to you to abort the pregnancy?

(this is the part...)
Click to expand...



Im going with what you about if it had human dna.
 
goldfly said:
Just like literally every other time we have talked about this

I am not a doctor and here to tell someone what medical procedures can or should be done

But you’ll freak out about that, like every other time I’ve answered it that way, and being irrational with it

And then claim some crazy stance from it

Then we will circle back to “won’t answer it”

For someone that talks about predictable responses. You’re a rinse and repeat poster lol
Click to expand...

Got it. So you can definitively say when its NOT a human... but you cannot say when it is

Hmmmm

Well I suppose I'll ask a different question that you should be able to be predictably wont answer.

Do you thing a 9 month pregnancy should be allowed to be aborted?
 
sturg33 said:
Did she just imply that men CANNOT get pregnant????

Oh man the trans community and ALCU are not gonna be happy about this

[Tw]1433501414131748869[/tw]
Click to expand...

Ask if I care?

See, we are at the part where you fly off the handle in some other tangent

But hey, you’re not predictable at all lol
 
goldfly said:
His first post once this law was passed was that the law of 6 weeks was too late and the fines not enough

I don’t agree with your stance that he “doesn’t want any suffering of women”



Thus my issue


But I digress
And my radical example of forcing males to do reversible procedures was to protect women from rapists. Thus why I used parallel to show no one wants medical procedures done against their will etc
Click to expand...

This is why I don’t argue the morality of abortion. The two sides aren’t necessarily adversarial. You and I might strongly disagree with both the other side’s argument and the implementation of laws that oppose our view of what life is, but that doesn’t mean the pro-life crowd is per se against women. There are some on the other side that surely hold sexist views and care little about the women involved, but the other side is not a monolith. Sometimes we just need to accept that our differences aren’t based on ill intent.
 
sturg33 said:
Got it. So you can definitively say when its NOT a human... but you cannot say when it is

Hmmmm

Well I suppose I'll ask a different question that you should be able to be predictably wont answer.

Do you thing a 9 month pregnancy should be allowed to be aborted?
Click to expand...

What part do you not understand about that post?

I mean, I’ve said it for years

That I want no medical procedures off the table cause who the ****s knows what needs to happen between a patient and a doctor


This is where you go “see, he wants to abort babies after they are born” or some other horse**** etc

And is why I usually don’t even try anymore to actually interact with you lol
 
goldfly said:
His first post once this law was passed was that the law of 6 weeks was too late and the fines not enough

I don’t agree with your stance that he “doesn’t want any suffering of women”



Thus my issue


But I digress
And my radical example of forcing males to do reversible procedures was to protect women from rapists. Thus why I used parallel to show no one wants medical procedures done against their will etc
Click to expand...

If you claim to believe life begins at conception and any pregnancy is a person, and I do, how could you not believe that 6 weeks is too late and $10,000 not enough? What kind of person would that be?
 
goldfly said:
What part do you not understand about that post?

I mean, I’ve said it for years

That I want no medical procedures off the table cause who the ****s knows what needs to happen between a patient and a doctor


This is where you go “see, he wants to abort babies after they are born” or some other horse**** etc

And is why I usually don’t even try anymore to actually interact with you lol
Click to expand...

You won't answer bc you are fully supportive of a 9 month pregnancy being terminated. And when you admit that, your "grain of salt" argument holds no water

You are very easy to predict. And you are a sick ****.

Imagine being on the side who is unwilling to say a 9 month pregnancy should not be allowed to be terminated.

But you are
 
I am fully on board in situations at day zero or day 280 of a pregnancy have literally every procedure available to be done if the doctor needs to do said procedure

That’s a right between a patient and a doctor

Somehow that’s a radical thought I gusss

But no one is voluntarily having abortions at day 279 lol
 
goldfly said:
I am fully on board in situations at day zero or day 280 of a pregnancy have literally every procedure available to be done if the doctor needs to do said procedure

That’s a right between a patient and a doctor

Somehow that’s a radical thought I gusss

But no one is voluntarily having abortions at day 279 lol
Click to expand...

Yes... saying a pregnancy should be allowed to terminate at any time is a radical position. And why you are a sick ****
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top