I don't know why my prior post is displaying in the quote. It's not in the quote when I go to edit it. Odd.
Back to respecting bodily autonomy I guess.
I remember when dems would say abortion should be rare.
Now the act of killing children is "love
[TW]1443636480488914948[/TW]
[TW]1443644080509100032[/TW]
If you chose to you could surrender a disabled child without further involvement while with a fetus you are demanding further expectations. I’m not advocating for that but it is an option. Forcing a mother to carry a child is society forcing a burden.Silly arguments that sidestep the primary question. What is the legal and moral status of a fetus? They assume it has not status separate from the mother and as such they see only benefits. The problem is they've made an initial assumption that they can't make.
The truth is you can make a lot of the same justifications for a parent to have the right to euthanize a disabled child. Having to raise a disabled child is expensive. It's an enormous burden for our lowest income people to bear. Allowing these people to euthanize their disabled children is an act of love as it prevents the child from having to live a life in poverty and it frees the parent to improve their situation.
Why is euthanizing a disabled child abhorrent while abortion is fine with these people? It's because they assign personhood to the disabled child but not the fetus. But why they do that is not adequately justified. It's a personal choice based on their own feelings and beliefs and that's perfectly fine. But stop acting like your initial assumption that a fetus is not a person is objectively right and not a personal choice.
The same is true of those railing against abortion as murder. They've assumed the fetus has the status the same as any person. That is also a personal choice based on their own feelings and beliefs. They then act as if that is objectively true and spit venom about it.
I just once want to see a debate about the philosophical question of the legal and moral status of a fetus.
'Forcing' a mother to carry a child is making her accountable for her actions.
I know the left is allergic to this type of thinking.
That presumption involves saying you have to be accountable for sex and have done something wrong. That kind of logic is really why I absolutely loathe social conservatives. At the end of the day they’re backwards prudes who can’t stay out of other peoples’ business.
That presumption involves saying you have to be accountable for sex and have done something wrong. That kind of logic is really why I absolutely loathe social conservatives. At the end of the day they’re backwards prudes who can’t stay out of other peoples’ business.
Yeah, slaying infants in the womb is where the forward thinkers are.
Has anyone here ever met or talked to someone who had to get an abortion?
Has anyone here ever met or talked to someone who had to get an abortion?
Has anyone here ever met or talked to someone who had to get an abortion?
They've all either become militantly pro life or had multiple abortions.
Had to?
this explains a lot if you asked this
What are some general reasons for someone you know who "had" to?