The Biden Presidency

I am not following this specific issue closely but I have a few questions. Who has been labeled a domestic terrorist? What does being labeled a domestic terrorist even mean? Are they on a no fly list? Can they not buy guns? Are they arrested? Also, what does "targeting" mean in the context used here. What specifically is the FBI doing to these parents that is"targeting". From what I see there is a disconnect based on the language used by "the right" to frame the issue in the way they want. I would guess Garland does not agree they are targeting "concerned parents" but would agree they are targeting parents who are using threats, intimidation and harassment instead of doing things through the proper channels and procedures.

Yeah, this whistleblower thing isn't as big a deal as some want to make it out to be. At best, if Garland knew about this stuff he should have mentioned it when he was testifying just to give a complete picture. But it's not persecuting concerned parents like people want to make it out as.

I actually think the FBI needs to have little intervention even in cases where a parent made a threat. That's a local issue for local authorities. If the FBI has a role at all it should be to monitor things from a national point of view to ensure there isn't some entity out there pulling strings (either for or against CRT) or inciting people. But a local individual threatening a school board member needs to be prosecuted by the local authorities.
 
He was put on task by the NSB in which didn’t have the support of over half its state association groups.

It opens the door to do just that, when like you said it’s a local issue. Domestic terrorism my ass
 
His approval numbers were never high in the first place.

Stolen election and as we move forward more and more people are seeing the obvious.
 
The left is anti-progress every step of the way. If they don't run it, they don't want it. The same will be true of climate change

[TW]1461339202579226624[/TW]
 
HAHAHAHA - "NOBODY" saw this coming?

Absurd that these papers think they are 'honestly' reporting.

Its all propaganda for the global aristocracy.
 
Was this article written by the lecturer?

[tw]1461651190144503808[/tw]

https://www.creators.com/read/veronique-de-rugy/11/21/pouring-fuel-on-the-spending-fire



It also doesn’t help that experts have been wrong about inflation. First, they claimed there would be no inflation. Then, when inflation inevitably came, they said it would be short-lived or transitory. When it persisted, the alleged reason was that prices were catching up to their pre-pandemic levels. Once experts finally admitted that some of the administration’s policies may have fueled some of the demand for durable goods and withdrawal of workers from the labor force, which in turn exacerbated the supply-chain issues, we were told either that there was nothing that could be done or that the resulting inflation was the price we must pay for a strong labor market.

 
https://www.creators.com/read/veronique-de-rugy/11/21/pouring-fuel-on-the-spending-fire



It also doesn’t help that experts have been wrong about inflation. First, they claimed there would be no inflation. Then, when inflation inevitably came, they said it would be short-lived or transitory. When it persisted, the alleged reason was that prices were catching up to their pre-pandemic levels. Once experts finally admitted that some of the administration’s policies may have fueled some of the demand for durable goods and withdrawal of workers from the labor force, which in turn exacerbated the supply-chain issues, we were told either that there was nothing that could be done or that the resulting inflation was the price we must pay for a strong labor market.


2020 was the year where I stopped believing in such a thing as "experts"

Very unimpressive people throughout the levels of our government and academia... about as impressive as the day to day folks we interact with everywhere
 
Back
Top