The Biden Presidency

https://thepostmillennial.com/bill-maher-putin-invasion-ukraine-biden-trump?utm_campaign=64502

"Okay, but if Putin thought Trump was really that supportive of him, why didn't he invade when Trump was in office?" Maher asked, adding: "It's at least worth asking that question if you're not locked into one intransigent thought."

__________________

More and more people are starting to see. The narrative on Trump was a complete lie and the reality of the Biden regime is terrifying.

Its incredible how dumb the left is in this country.
 
sturg33 said:
How many times do our "experts" and "government officials" and "media" have to get things horribly wrong before the idiots stop blindly believing them?
Click to expand...

They are believing them on the war march now which is sad. And it aint just the left.
 
mqt said:
Yes, a dip which would have continued under Biden initially. But oil production has been rising again to previous levels based on the chart.
Click to expand...

There was growth in production for effectively all of hte Trump years and would have continued to do so (ignore COVID for both sides) if leases for new space were not denied.

To act like this regime is not anti-fossil fuel is an interesting angle.
 
Catturd ™
@catturd2
·
23m
Prepare for another week of the Biden regime screwing everything up, followed by blaming everyone else for their failures.
 
thethe said:
There was growth in production for effectively all of hte Trump years and would have continued to do so (ignore COVID for both sides) if leases for new space were not denied.

To act like this regime is not anti-fossil fuel is an interesting angle.
Click to expand...

I’m not arguing the Administration isn’t against fossil fuels. What I’m arguing is that we haven’t really seen the effect yet of that reality. Oil production is still steadily climbing back up under Biden and there are plenty of approved oil leases that haven’t been used yet. If we’re still drilling domestically as we have for years, what has Biden’s stance on fossil fuels actually accomplished?
 
mqt said:
I’m not arguing the Administration isn’t against fossil fuels. What I’m arguing is that we haven’t really seen the effect yet of that reality. Oil production is still steadily climbing back up under Biden and there are plenty of approved oil leases that haven’t been used yet. If we’re still drilling domestically as we have for years, what has Biden’s stance on fossil fuels actually accomplished?
Click to expand...

Because when supply runs out on certain land you need to have developed land to continue the smae level of production.

We know for a fact that they stopped awarding new leases on federal lands.
 
Baker Hughes Crude Oil Rig Count

united-states-crude-oil-rigs.png


https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/crude-oil-rigs
 
Last edited:
thethe said:
Because when supply runs out on certain land you need to have developed land to continue the smae level of production.

We know for a fact that they stopped awarding new leases on federal lands.
Click to expand...

But if we’re still producing more oil, wouldn’t this be more of a concern with the Administration’s long term strategy than anything Biden is actively causing?
 
mqt said:
But if we’re still producing more oil, wouldn’t this be more of a concern with the Administration’s long term strategy than anything Biden is actively causing?
Click to expand...

Markets are forward looking. What is happening today is irrelevant on prices.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top