To be clear, I don't think what you said was inflammatory in a vacuum. But I can certainly understand an algorithm picking up on your pattern of inflammatory posts and flagging this one as potentially hateful/threatening. It's how algorithms work. There isn't a special Twitter employee following your specific posts and deciding goldfly needs to be banned.
The Bird is Freed
- Thread starter Krgrecw
- Start date
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
This may change but right now the only comment on this post is some naked porn bot showing tits. What the ****.
[tw]1777778056792363032[/tw]
[tw]1777778056792363032[/tw]
Twitter is filled with porn bots.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Lawsuit will be dismissed with prejudice. If there was a betting line on that I'd say hammer it.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
2 reasons
1. Yes it's obvious what happened. Someone was saying horribly anti-semitic and insensitive things online and was fired.
2. Disney has the right to first Carano for almost any reason. Ignoring the damage she did to the brand, ignoring everything else. They could fire her because they didn't see her character leaving.
I want to know if you had an employee who was online calling you a douchebag, would you fire them?
LOL, what exactly was anti-semitic about this tweet
Granted, it's a dumb comparison. But anti-semitic? That's a huge reach.
Last edited:
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
The government didnt make the German people hate Jews. They already hated the Jews. They didnt particularly like them during WW1, then they blamed them for surrendering in WW2. Antisemitism wasnt even specific to Germany at the time. Hitler and the Nazis just poured gasoline on that fire for their own benefit.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
Well. I did it again
This time I laughed at a reporter calling the man who was creepy towards Caitlin Clark for calling him a cis man and then agreed the reporter should lose his credentials
Man, the bird is so free lol
“ We have determined your post violated our rules against Hateful Conduct.
Cis men lol Dude should lose his credentials ftr“
I can taste the free speech lol
This time I laughed at a reporter calling the man who was creepy towards Caitlin Clark for calling him a cis man and then agreed the reporter should lose his credentials
Man, the bird is so free lol
“ We have determined your post violated our rules against Hateful Conduct.
Cis men lol Dude should lose his credentials ftr“
I can taste the free speech lol
I would suggest creating a new twitter account at this point. It's quite clear that the algorithm has flagged your profile. And if I recall, I think when Elon took over, he had the word "cis" labeled as a slur.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
sturg33
I
Yes. Freed from government censorship
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
Weird how he’s bent to governments though
But go on believing your delusion
And I’d say this is moving goal posts under the elon regime but have at it man
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
Orly?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kather...censorship-since-musk-took-over-report-finds/
and
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/post-withheld-by-country
Musk didn't intend to freed from government censorship, he attempted a pump and dump, was called on his bluff, and now is trying to make himself some kind of holy warrior.
sturg33
I
Yes twitter operates by the laws of the countries they operate in.
In America, it is illegal for the government to censor social media companies