Fair point but despite how bad of a person Putin is there is much more freedom in russia on comparison to China. Information would flow if this was demonstrably false.
Valid point.
Fair point but despite how bad of a person Putin is there is much more freedom in russia on comparison to China. Information would flow if this was demonstrably false.
I don't know the death rate and I think your confidence in your "hunch" that the most optimistic outcome is the right one is worrisome. Based on the "math" you've laid out in this thread, you expect the actual death rate to be something like 0.06% (50% infection in US; 100k deaths). I don't see any actual experts saying that, so I'm inclined to think it is higher even under perfect conditions. It will certainly be higher if we "just let it happen" and the hospitals get completely overwhelmed. The fact that you are not worried about the conditions where your hunch is wrong is short-sighted at best, and immoral at worst.
I know that in NYC, where I live, like one in 1 in 250 people have already tested positive based on the normal population of the city, but that hit rate is likely even higher now considering how many have fled the city. That numbers is only gonna get worse. I know that ~ 1 in 70 of those who have tested positive here have died. I know that more of the current positives will die. I know that people who have yet to test positive will die. I know that a youngish guy I was in a room with in early February is currently in the ICU fighting for his life. I know that no credible expert is saying what you are saying. I know that not even the optimistic experts you've cited to in this thread are even saying what you are saying.
I know that if you are relying on maga tinfoil-hatters for your general information rather than actual doctors and epidemiologists, you are doing yourself a disservice.
I understand what you are saying and yes it does cast more shade on the fatality rate (though I’m sure we agree the bias in the denominator is far greater than the numerator).
But in this scenario you (along with millions of others) have already been infected and recovered (which is great news!). What good does quarantine do if you already have the antibodies? Anecdotally speaking, your experience supports ending the lockdown sooner.
I agree with you on which data points we should focus on. But to understand the peak projection for deaths and ICUs, we need to understand where we sit on the curve. Is this just the beginning or are we approaching the peak? The data out of China and Korea suggests that we will reach the peak within April and not May/June. This is the critical question we need to answer when we debate when to reopen schools and businesses.
I would like to see more discussion on how to help emerging countries. They simply do not have the healthcare or technological capacity to cope with this disease. For those countries, it seems like the only real way to manage is a vaccine and that’s obviously months away.
We are going to start seeing some unimaginable, depressing stories soon. I just don’t know how you protect those workers.
Your issue is you don't think we have been exposed to the virus all that long.
What we do know is the virus does not mutate which means vaccines and antibodies will be extremely effective.The dangerous part of that is we know so little about COVID-19 and the chance of a 2nd infection. While it's likely that you will build up an immunity to it (like most other viruses), we can't say that for sure at this time.
"Actually, what if we've all been sick for months" is not science or math, it is just you making stuff up. It's a stupid argument that makes it clear you have no idea what you are talking about. Just absolute ****ing lunacy.
How many people died of COVID in NY 1 month ago today? Zero. The first death in NY was March 14. How many people died of COVID in NY yesterday = 100+. The number of deaths has been doubling every 2 days. It is just facile to suggest that what is happening now could have been happening since December. I mean just look at this log graph:
![]()
I just don't know how you could argue with a straight-face that it has been saturating the state for months. You really think that in the 3-4 months before March 14, we were all being completely exposed, but then in celebration of the Ides of March it magically started killing people at an exponential rate? That makes negative sense. It's a ****ing stupid thing to think, unless you think the incubation period is like 3 months (which would mean we are really and truly ****ed).
It is certainly possible that there were specific individuals that had exposure months ago. That has nothing to do with the widespread pandemic effects currently happening.
Trump has gotten a bump in his approval of the handling of this.
We'll see how long this honeymoon lasts. Bush's approval rating skyrocketed to 90% after 9/11 and then it went down and down and down.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/08/health/flu-season-severity.html
As of the last week of December, “widespread” flu activity was reported by health departments in 46 states. More ominously, a second measure — the percentage of patients with flu symptoms visiting medical clinics — shot up almost to the peak reached at the height of the 2017-18 flu season, which was the most severe in a decade.
______________________________________________________________
So when you are ready to apologize I'll be right here.
Of all the people that died from the 'flu' the past 3 months. How many were tested for the corona virus?.
A Record 131,604 Lab-Confirmed Flu Cases Reported This Season
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced the total number of flu cases in New York State has eclipsed the record number of seasonal cases since the New York State Department of Health began tracking flu cases during the 1998-99 season. The latest influenza surveillance report for the week ending February 22 shows 131,604 laboratory-confirmed cases so far this season. Previously, the most lab-confirmed influenza cases reported during a single flu season was 128,892 in 2017-18. While this year's flu season has reached historic levels, last week, the number of laboratory-confirmed flu cases decreased 26 percent and hospitalizations decreased 13 percent.
Why would the flu vaccine not be working effectively against this strain? Hmm I wonder if its because its the corona virus
most American cases this season have been caused by a very different strain, called B Victoria. [...]
Thus far, based on limited testing data, this season’s flu shot does not look like a good match for the B Victoria flu and may not be very effective, the C.D.C. said. But the shot does still appear to be well matched for the A(H1N1)pdm09 strain.
LOL, you didn't even read the article?
Dude, just stop.