The Coronavirus, not the beer

thethe said:
If the virus is spread amongst the vaccinated population then I'm not sure why it matters if healthy people are taking it.

And there is an argument that if too many are vaccinated the virus will more quickly adapt and then make them less effective.
Click to expand...

see post 19184
 
thethe said:
What we are seeing is the start of the virus being able to get past the experimental treatments protections. If you think we have the full picture of the data yet then man I've overestimated you.
Click to expand...
You continue to ascribe some sort of intelligence to a dude who continues to prove he has none
 
[tw]1421464650512797697[/tw]

We will not submit to the Global Aristocracy.

Wuhan Lab / Nov 3rd / Jan 6th

All linked and has brought us to this point.
 
sturg33 said:
[tw]1421492268893188101[/tw]
Click to expand...

I'm just confused why the lecturer is not running to his favorite quote machine.

This bungling of the CCP virus and the vaccine messaging far exceeds anything we saw in 2020. What a disaster. Just embarrassing that we have these people running the country. We have never been more vulnerable.
 
I always heard about antibiotics contributing to the emergence of strains that are resistant to the antibiotics. Which is why doctors now try to be economical in prescribing antibiotics (some economist explained negative externalities to them).

I have not up until now heard that vaccines contribute to new strains. The logic to me is that the less the virus is circulating the less the opportunity to mutate into a new strain.

Get your shot y'all.
 
nsacpi said:
I always heard about antibiotics contributing to the emergence of strains that are resistant to the antibiotics. Which is why doctors now try to be economical in prescribing antibiotics (some economist explained negative externalities to them).

I have not up until now heard that vaccines contribute to new strains. The logic to me is that the less the virus is circulating the less the opportunity to mutate into a new strain.

Get your shot y'all.
Click to expand...

You'll get there 6 months from now. Wapo will discuss it eventually
 
thethe said:
^
Click to expand...

firstly, let me say i appreciate the irony of you bringing up an article in the WAPO

secondly, i wonder if acesfull has something to say about the P-town outbreak. Would it be an indicator that Walensky might not be wrong about the rate at which breakthrough infections occur? Certainly the picture is one that has to be constantly updated as new data are collected and analyzed.
 
nsacpi said:
firstly, let me say i appreciate the irony of you bringing up an article in the WAPO

secondly, i wonder if acesful has something to say about the P-town outbreak. Would it be an indicator that Wolensky might not be wrong about the rate at which breakthrough infections occur?
Click to expand...

I'm more quoting a reaction of Tim Pool which I share. I'm just glad its in WAPO and not in ZeroHedge or else you'd just mock the source despite the underlying data to be accurate.

We absolutely need an explanation for this and I hope its just a 'crap in crap out' scenario because if not, then we need a completely new approach moving forward.
 
[tw]1421260012677070851[/tw]

[tw]1421260016170926084[/tw]

[tw]1421260021023711236[/tw]

[tw]1421260026769928194[/tw]

[tw]1421260029236187139[/tw]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top