The Coronavirus, not the beer

citing dailymail as a source is bull****.

BTW 77 deaths in sweden would be the equivalent of about 2,500 death in the US when you adjust for population.
 
zitothebrave said:
citing dailymail as a source is bull****.

BTW 77 deaths in sweden would be the equivalent of about 2,500 death in the US when you adjust for population.
Click to expand...

Nobody has ever said death wouldnt happen. Its what's coming down the road and early data is good but needs to continue before you can say anything definitive
 
thethe said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...hs-coronavirus.html?__twitter_impression=true

Apparently the leading measures are looking promising for Sweden. Excellent sign.
Click to expand...

Excellent sign? The graph in that article seems to show a pretty bad trend to me:

27045202-8208397-image-a-39_1586528813185.jpg
 
FINLAND and Norway so far appear to have done a better job of protecting their citizens than Sweden. But this Nordic saga is far from over.
 
Metaphysicist said:
Deaths is the only metric that matters. But the "new case" chart is the same, regardless.

27045220-8208397-image-a-40_1586528869721.jpg
Click to expand...

And the rate has significantly decreased. You're literally falling into the same trap that had you believe hundreds of thousands would die even with mitigation.
 
Metaphysicist said:
I mean, the picture is right there.



Still waiting for that quote.
Click to expand...

It doesnt exist in your world of reasonable doubt. I'm not going to try and out lawyer you because that's a foolish endeavor. You were still alarmed when the minimum anyone thought was possible was hundreds of thousands.
 
thethe said:
And the rate has significantly decreased. You're literally falling into the same trap that had you believe hundreds of thousands would die even with mitigation.
Click to expand...

WEll if we matched Sweden's rates, we'd have about 28K dead.

And play with the number of assuming Italy is 2 weeks ahead and look at their curve of deats. Which would put them around where Italy was on March 28th or so. Where they did start their death decline on a daily rate, but still had 8826 of their 19468 deaths, which means even if they do what Italy does which there isn't any sign of that.

Sweden has garbage recovery ratings.
 
zitothebrave said:
WEll if we matched Sweden's rates, we'd have about 28K dead.

And play with the number of assuming Italy is 2 weeks ahead and look at their curve of deats. Which would put them around where Italy was on March 28th or so. Where they did start their death decline on a daily rate, but still had 8826 of their 19468 deaths, which means even if they do what Italy does which there isn't any sign of that.

Sweden has garbage recovery ratings.
Click to expand...

They are running into immunity walls which is why the growth rate in infections stalled. They will have another bad fee weeks but afterwards the population is protected.

They are also protecting at risk population so I'll be interested to see the per capital admissions rate based on age for all countries.

Sweden is doing this right.
 
thethe said:
They are running into immunity walls which is why the growth rate in infections stalled. They will have another bad fee weeks but afterwards the population is protected.

They are also protecting at risk population so I'll be interested to see the per capital admissions rate based on age for all countries.

Sweden is doing this right.
Click to expand...

WE'll find out if they're doing it right. IF they aren't a lot of people are going to die unnecessarily. All in the name of the "economy" an artificial construct that will be resolved.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top