The Coronavirus, not the beer

You're a smart guy sturg. One of my favorite posters to read and a great critical thinker.

But this is absolutely how you come across when stating "this isn't a threat to people under 50". While technically true, its remarkably unsympathetic and truly missing the point to why people support "shelter in place". We are doing this to protect those at risk groups that have no way to protect themselves if the rest of us move around at our leisure.

That's not my suggestion.

But it absolutely is my suggestion to not shut down the world with a giant sledge hammer. Perhaps we could be a bit more surgical, more targeted,more data driven? Perhaps we dont inflict more damage than we are stopping?
 
I don't feel righteous about any of this. And have changed my mind about some things.

But the government did not shut down the economy and throw 20 million out of their jobs. There are a handful of governments out there encouraging everyone to carry on as usual and their economies are also losing very large numbers of jobs.

An earthquake happens. No government says well let's pretend nothing happened and everyone go to work tomorrow and do their jobs. It doesn't work that way.
 
I don't feel righteous about any of this. And have changed my mind about some things.

But the government did not shut down the economy and throw 20 million out of their jobs. There are a handful of governments out there encouraging everyone to carry on as usual and their economies are also losing very large numbers of jobs.

An earthquake happens. No government says well let's pretend nothing happened and everyone go to work tomorrow and do their jobs. It doesn't work that way.

Lack of information and fear mongering **** down the economy.
 
Lack of information and fear mongering **** down the economy.

That's too easy a take. People are afraid because there are objective reasons to be afraid and uncertain about their safety. A partial restoration of a sense of safety is a very important component of any recovery plan from here on out. I watched some of Merkel's speech today. That's laidership. She laid out the path ahead, and laid out the risks in a way people can understand.
 
That's too easy a take. People are afraid because there are objective reasons to be afraid and uncertain about their safety. A partial restoration of a sense of safety is a very important component of any recovery plan from here on out. I watched some of Merkel's speech today. That's laidership. She laid out the path ahead, and laid out the risks in a way people can understand.

You weren't allowed to talk about sensible paths. Sweden was slandered for their decision. These attacks were made without consideration of the data and trends. Pure lunacy.

We should always be honest and let people make up their minds.

Approach correctly this is a very low risk virus.
 
[TW]1237027356314869761[/TW]

Just want to look back at this tweet exactly 1 month and 1 week ago.

37k deaths calculated in a year for the flu season.

By tomorrow we will have eclipsed 37k deaths in roughly 45 days.

How ANYONE can say, that mitigation and enacting social distancing measures didn't prevent thousands if not hundreds of thousands of deaths, with how fast this was spreading in March, I just don't know.
 
That's not my suggestion.

But it absolutely is my suggestion to not shut down the world with a giant sledge hammer. Perhaps we could be a bit more surgical, more targeted,more data driven? Perhaps we dont inflict more damage than we are stopping?

Is anyone arguing against a more data driven, surgical approach? I'm certainly not.

So what is your suggestion? I might have missed it between the barrage of Berenson tweets from you and thethe.

If you ask for my suggestion, I would initiate effective at the end of next week:

- Soft reopening of all businesses, including restaurants and movie theaters, under the condition they limit occupancy to data driven headcount per square footage.
- Reopen schools, but allow students to continue online schooling indefinitely (individual families should make the decision whether or not their children will expose themselves to at risk groups)
- Where possible, businesses should continue to encourage remote work. However, businesses will be allowed to return workers to the office provided they limit groups to a data driven determined number
- Contact tracing, however, we should as a first resort explore anonymous contact tracing (here is a crappy article to give a terrible description of what it is: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news...s-bluetooth-anonymously-spot-disease-contacts)
- Rapid expansion of testing, including serological testing, so we can track herd immunity levels at county level to progress in the reopening of the economy in phases depending on immunity levels
- Provide funding for free at home delivery services for at risk individuals. We need to give these individuals every reason not to leave their home.
 
[TW]1237027356314869761[/TW]

Just want to look back at this tweet exactly 1 month and 1 week ago.

37k deaths calculated in a year for the flu season.

By tomorrow we will have eclipsed 37k deaths in roughly 45 days.

How ANYONE can say, that mitigation and enacting social distancing measures didn't prevent thousands if not hundreds of thousands of deaths, with how fast this was spreading in March, I just don't know.

It was slowing before lockdowns. It would have been worse than what it was but maybe another 10-15%.

I think we will find out the infected percentage is very high.
 
Is anyone arguing against a more data driven, surgical approach? I'm certainly not.

So what is your suggestion? I might have missed it between the barrage of Berenson tweets from you and thethe.

If you ask for my suggestion, I would initiate effective at the end of next week:

- Soft reopening of all businesses, including restaurants and movie theaters, under the condition they limit occupancy to data driven headcount per square footage.
- Reopen schools, but allow students to continue online schooling indefinitely (individual families should make the decision whether or not their children will expose themselves to at risk groups)
- Where possible, businesses should continue to encourage remote work. However, businesses will be allowed to return workers to the office provided they limit groups to a data driven determined number
- Contact tracing, however, we should as a first resort explore anonymous contact tracing (here is a crappy article to give a terrible description of what it is: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news...s-bluetooth-anonymously-spot-disease-contacts)
- Rapid expansion of testing, including serological testing, so we can track herd immunity levels at county level to progress in the reopening of the economy in phases depending on immunity levels
- Provide funding for free at home delivery services for at risk individuals. We need to give these individuals every reason not to leave their home.

I'll just say this. We need to take this small step by small step. At best we have driven R naught slightly below 1. As Merkel explained this leaves you with a very thin margin for error. Ideally we should drive it down to .5 or lower before we open up.
 
It was slowing before lockdowns. It would have been worse than what it was but maybe another 10-15%.

I think we will find out the infected percentage is very high.

Even if we accept that estimate, we’re talking about roughly 50,000 deaths in a month and a half. The President’s tweet remains ridiculously dumb in that case, since that’s damn near the upper end of the spectrum for an entire year of the flu.
 
Even if we accept that estimate, we’re talking about roughly 50,000 deaths in a month and a half. The President’s tweet remains ridiculously dumb in that case, since that’s damn near the upper end of the spectrum for an entire year of the flu.

Trump says stupid **** all the time. Not sure why this always drives your decisions. It's a data driven choice the results in the overall best macro outcome.
 
“The key to opening up the economy is mass testing.” Lindsey Graham

“You don’t have to be an infectious disease doctor to figure out that the testing is going to be the gateway to making people feel safe and comfortable going out and reopening the economy.” Amy Klobuchar

“It is the single best tool to inform decisions and to calibrate all of this. This has to be figured out. I understand that this is a problematic area and the federal government’s not eager to get involved in testing. I get that, but the plain reality here is we have to do it in partnership with the federal government.” Andrew Cuomo
 
31ff70b2e4c60d9743ac6b65258cd585


The curve for deaths is not a Bell curve. There is more space in the right handed tail. More deaths.

And if R naught is just under 1 there could be a lot more in the right handed tail. Including more risk of secondary spikes.
 
Last edited:
“The key to opening up the economy is mass testing.” Lindsey Graham

“You don’t have to be an infectious disease doctor to figure out that the testing is going to be the gateway to making people feel safe and comfortable going out and reopening the economy.” Amy Klobuchar

“It is the single best tool to inform decisions and to calibrate all of this. This has to be figured out. I understand that this is a problematic area and the federal government’s not eager to get involved in testing. I get that, but the plain reality here is we have to do it in partnership with the federal government.” Andrew Cuomo

Sounds like bipartisan tyranny.
 
Lack of information and fear mongering **** down the economy.

Trump's obvious daily lying and campaign of misinformation has created a situation where most people are forced to assume the opposite of what he says.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top