The Coronavirus, not the beer

thethe said:
experts thinking they are undercounted is based on excess mortality that isn't properly considering increass in deaths caused by lockouts. You'll learn that soon enough.
Click to expand...

I'm glad we have a medical expert on this forum to tell us these things.
 
thethe said:
Another one hurt that they've been wrong the whole time.

You know what this does to blended IFR right?

I guess you'll just dismiss Dr. Birx now
Click to expand...

Dismissing? No. I don't dismiss opinions that grounded in facts and statistics. It's a valid opinion, which is exactly why I said it could be overcounted but it could also be undercounted. There isn't a way to know for sure.

Passing off her opinion as a fact when a ton of other experts disagree seems.... extremely foolish. Not only that, but the variance that we COULD be overcounting is unknown as well. It's just a guess on her part. If it's under like 7-8%, it wouldn't have a huge affect on the IFR.

Again, using this as some of vindication is extremely dumb.
 
Last edited:
Carp said:
Dismissing? No. I don't dismiss opinions that grounded in facts and statistics. It's a valid opinion, which is exactly why I said it could be overcounted but it could also be undercounted. There isn't a way to know for sure.

Passing off her opinion as a fact when a ton of other experts disagree seems.... extremely foolish. Not only that, but the variance that we COULD be overcounting is unknown as well. It's just a guess on her part. If it's under 7-8%, it wouldn't have a huge affect on the IFR.

Again, using this as some of vindication is extremely dumb.
Click to expand...

Birx said something similar to this months ago and said that we were being aggressive in coding.

We created economic incentives to label patient admissions as COVID.

This was obvious from the beginning.

You guys can keep trying to spin bit soon it will be so obvious that nobody will post in this thread anymore and create a new scandal as to why OMB.
 
thethe said:
Birx said something similar to this months ago and said that we were being aggressive in coding.

We created economic incentives to label patient admissions as COVID.

This was obvious from the beginning.

You guys can keep trying to spin bit soon it will be so obvious that nobody will post in this thread anymore and create a new scandal as to why OMB.
Click to expand...

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coronavirus-nyc-deaths-cdc-study-higher-offical-count/

Obviously this means we've undercounted potentially 24k deaths. We now know this is a fact. thethe logic.
 
Last edited:
Carp said:
Dismissing Fauci's opinion. OH THE IRONY!
Click to expand...

His opinion has been discussed ad nauseum. Its the misguided theory of excess deaths. A certain poster has been pushing that foolishly without realizing the assumptions are wrong.

But what Birx is saying is quantifiable. Big difference.
 
Last edited:
[Tw]1260234258788032514[/tw]

I'd love to see a Rand/Tucker ticket. Just need to get Rand to change some of his theory on trade with a communist nation.
 
[Tw]1260227495992987648[/tw]

How many things can the expert community, and the one on this forum, get wrong?

I guess the better question is if you all got anything right.

Maybe re think your biases?
 
thethe said:
Where there is death there will always be death.

Glad you're being selfish and thinking about your mom above millions of families who don't know how they'll feed their kids.

How noble of you.
Click to expand...

This is a hell of a post and reply to what i said

And he has the nerve to say others are stupid or have a mental disorder

Lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top