When a damn letter is issued with multiple scientists the assumption will always be that they are endorsing it using a risk assessment that is grounded in science.
That letter said "experts" not scientists, did it not? And if people are making an erroneous assumption based on that letter, that's on them.
And we are going tonjust glance over the WHO bungling of the virus and being bought and paid for by China right?
They arent representative of the scientific community?
Experts in what exactly? What should be inferred?
The bought and paid for **** is just more political bull****, and plenty of people and organizations made mistakes in regards to this virus. Scientists aren't perfect, and science itself is constantly evolving and taking steps closer to the truth of a matter and never stops, regardless of how much we think we might know (take gravity for example and the study that is still involved there). It is complete crap to take this situation that has been manipulated and twisted by people in power and try to lay the blame at the feet of the scientists simply trying to do their job. It doesn't surprise me that it is happening, however, since science has always been the favorite target of a certain type of people.
My general belief is the less government interference in anything, the better. I think that applies here
Mistakes are different then outright lies and changing of stories.
How could anyone defend the WHO right now?
I'm defending the scientists who are being scapegoated with this kind of ****, and the science behind them that is being smeared because it doesn't fit a certain agenda.
Oh yay.
UCSUSA doesn't have a political agenda.
Come on.
Sadly, science, like everything else, has become highly partisan and its hard to trust anything now.
The WHO is a reflection of the scientific community. Just like the letter of experts does that.
The WHO is a reflection of the scientific community. Just like the letter of experts does that.
That letter, by the way, said health professionals, not scientists. I dated a health professional for 12 years...trust me when I say that they aren't scientists. lol
Right, a health professional could be a nurse. Which not to say nurses are dumb, but I know some dumb nurses.
Right, a health professional could be a nurse. Which not to say nurses are dumb, but I know some dumb nurses.