The Coronavirus, not the beer

thethe said:
Zero cost is plain wrong. If you want something tangible then how about the environmental impacts of these masks being thrown all over the place?

The real damage though is psychological and what we have done to our poor children.
Click to expand...

Again, I'm talking about personal choices. If you choose to wear a mask, there's no real downside to it. If you choose to throw the mask onto the ground, that's a second choice that has the negative impact.

And I completely disagree about the "poor children." You keep talking about no evidence masks work, there's also no real evidence that masks do any psychological harm.
 
We have over a decade of research showing masks are not effective.

We have never done this type of experiment in children and from the parents I speak to there has certainly been damage done to today’s kids.

So your comparison is kind of silly. One we know for a fact and the other it’s pretty clear despite no studies being done.
 
striker42 said:
Again, I'm talking about personal choices. If you choose to wear a mask, there's no real downside to it. If you choose to throw the mask onto the ground, that's a second choice that has the negative impact.

And I completely disagree about the "poor children." You keep talking about no evidence masks work, there's also no real evidence that masks do any psychological harm.
Click to expand...

But we didn't have personal choices.

It was a mandate, with zero evidence

And I can give you a list of negative affects if you'd like
 
thethe said:
We have over a decade of research showing masks are not effective.
Click to expand...

Can you point me to this body of research? Virtually everything that I've read- particularly epidemiological studies from the past year- would suggest that they do work to varying degrees.

Even if they were only 2% effective, I would probably still have worn one in public spaces before I was vaccinated because it is such an absurdly small inconvenience.
 
McCann'sCans said:
Can you point me to this body of research? Virtually everything that I've read- particularly epidemiological studies from the past year- would suggest that they do work to varying degrees.

Even if they were only 2% effective, I would probably still have worn one in public spaces before I was vaccinated because it is such an absurdly small inconvenience.
Click to expand...

This is where I'm at. Even small decreases in spread will save lives and make it work the, as you accurately put it, absurdly small inconvenience. Wearing one was the right choice to make.
 
zitothebrave said:
This post describes all you need to konw about thethe, he follows someone who'd a news anchor for Newsmax.

Congrats, you've failed a basic common sense test.
Click to expand...

following the MSM has led to be wrong about literally everything.

the people who trust them - like you - are complete sheep
 
zitothebrave said:
This post describes all you need to konw about thethe, he follows someone who'd a news anchor for Newsmax.

Congrats, you've failed a basic common sense test.
Click to expand...

For starters I don’t think you understand how Twitter works.

Secondly, this idea that only certain outfits (that consistently lie) are the only approved news sources just proves how much of a worthless/mindless sheep you are. Thankfully for you you have a sugar mommy.
 
sturg33 said:
following the MSM has led to be wrong about literally everything.

the people who trust them - like you - are complete sheep
Click to expand...

It’s fascinating they continue this line of logic after being lies to over and over and over and over.
 
sturg33 said:
following the MSM has led to be wrong about literally everything.

the people who trust them - like you - are complete sheep
Click to expand...

Yeah let's trust newsmax

This **** always ends so well for you folks. Like when you were hyping up sources who wound up getting sued by dominion.
 
zitothebrave said:
Yeah let's trust newsmax

This **** always ends so well for you folks. Like when you were hyping up sources who wound up getting sued by dominion.
Click to expand...

I've not watched a second of newsmax.

But my sources on covid has been a hell of a lot stronger than yours.

Remember when you were double masking? LOL
 
sturg33 said:
I've not watched a second of newsmax.

But my sources on covid has been a hell of a lot stronger than yours.

Remember when you were double masking? LOL
Click to expand...

Never was double masking myself.

What source told you Stockholm was more densely populated than NYC?
 
thethe said:
For starters I don’t think you understand how Twitter works.

Secondly, this idea that only certain outfits (that consistently lie) are the only approved news sources just proves how much of a worthless/mindless sheep you are. Thankfully for you you have a sugar mommy.
Click to expand...

No it's not an idea that only certain outfits are approved sources, but when you don't see me citing Huffington Post on here.

I understand how twitter works, I think you don't know how it works, when it comes to sharing things, consider who you're sharing, not just leaning into the algorithm. The Algorithm knows you're a looney WLM MRA crazy person because you follow Cernovich which tells them everyhting they need to know about you. You fall into a failure of character when you expect honest sourcing from a self proclaimed troll.

Again, I know you wouldn't have the stones to say any of these insults to my face, which I always find funny. You also clearly know nothing about running a business, creating jobs, creating something for the economy. As you're content with a job where you clock in your 40 hours of depression and count down days until you can finally be happy when you retire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top