The Coronavirus, not the beer

tululush said:
Are you going to answer how an iq test is administered to a baby? And if tests where given who provided these tests? How was the data gathered? Who analyzed the data?

I mean I’m conducting a non-peer reviewed, single-blind study of dumbass thethe comments as we speak and my data is overwhelming. I’m willing to bet if I provide my findings to the Post they’ll also write an article, it’ll get tweeted out, and then I can post it here.
Click to expand...

You realize that the science of babies has been around for a long time and they have been conducting these types of tests that prove to reliable later on right?

You can't be this stupid. This has to be a dug in partisian take because you pushed lockdowns and masks like a ****ing moron.
 
thethe said:
You realize that the science of babies has been around for a long time and they have been conducting these types of tests that prove to reliable later on right?

You can't be this stupid. This has to be a dug in partisian take because you pushed lockdowns and masks like a ****ing moron.
Click to expand...

So you’re not going to tell me how a baby born in the last 8-12 months has been tested cognitively and how there’s been enough data to develop an non-skewed opinion? Didn’t think so. Instead just name call because yet again, you’re providing subjective information. Good job. Do you have any more earth shattering content produced by the Post? Any big foot covid articles you’d like to share?
 
What an awful attempt to divert from the actual conclusions. I should expect no less and I was so mad when I read this I broke my rule in even interacting with you.

It was my mistake. It won't happen again.
 
thethe said:
What an awful attempt to divert from the actual conclusions. I should expect no less and I was so mad when I read this I broke my rule in even interacting with you.

It was my mistake. It won't happen again.
Click to expand...

Divert from the actual conclusions. Hmm or divert from providing an answer to a question I asked twice. Good job, hypocrite.

Hahaha oh no, little thethe got mad. Tsk tsk you should exercise better will power. You can only handle one vice at a time and clinging to nonsensical, non-peer reviewed, conspiracy theories is enough for one person.

When you do find those other compelling New York Post articles please do share with the group. Either that or you’ll disappear again for months like you did after Trump lost the election.
 
And we can be certain the state will label resistance as terrorists.

And the idiots like goldfly who cheer them on would have made clear what their role would have been in history
 
The people who have lied and gotten everything wrong, are now telling you that your fellow citizens are a domestic threat to you bc they object to forced medical treatments on people

It is so easy to see how past tyrannical situations came to be. I am surprised how easy it is

[TW]1426648245367984143[/TW]
 
goldfly said:
I know

Just giving examples of the people fraud boy thinks shouldn’t be watched etc
Click to expand...

He was a business owner going broke because of lockdowns. Which I know you thought he deserved to, but still it’s probably a bad feeling for a provider.

Quite the stretch imo.

To my knowledge has he done anything? If not I don’t think it proves what you think it does
 
Attitudes on drinking and driving have changed. Behold a 1984 op ed in the NY Times titled Drinking and Driving Can Mix.

First 3 paragraphs:


LAST Saturday night I drove home drunk or almost certainly that would have been the indication from any breath or blood test that I might have been required to take. I drove home drunk the Saturday before that, too, and the one before that, and the one before that, in what probably amounts to a fairly consistent pattern over the last 25 years, ever since I have been licensed to drive.

During those 25 years, I have never had an accident, nor have I ever been issued a summons for driving while intoxicated or impaired. This is not to suggest that I encourage weekend intemperance, or intemperance at any time, for that matter. Neither do I wish to extol my own driving ability, nor to say that somehow I've been leading a charmed life, because what happens to be true for me applies no less to nearly all of my friends.

Indeed, I would venture to extend that to include the vast majority of those whose life styles are in general similar to mine; namely, to all who regularly socialize with family, friends and neighbors, at cocktail or dinner parties, in private homes, restaurants, clubs or any other place where alcoholic beverages are customarily served. At the end of any particular evening, most of those who have engaged in such activities undoubtedly have in their bloodstreams a measure of alcohol above the minimum percentage established by the state beyond which one may be considered intoxicated or impaired, or, to put it bluntly, drunk. Yet these people almost invariably drive home safely without incident, accident or arrest - just as I do.

https://www.nytimes.com/1984/06/03/nyregion/long-island-opinion-drinking-and-driving-can-mix.html

37 years later this argument hasn't aged very well

in other countries the adjustment has come much later...only 15 years ago the restaurant business in France was up in arms that the French police were killing their business because they had started to enforce laws against drunk driving...there were actually demonstrations against this newest form of tyranny...of course all it takes is a warm breeze to get the French to gather in protest...but the restauranteurs had a point...the new enforcement policy did hurt their businesses
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top