Getting it when you are 99.9999999% likely to not even have a runny nose (Yes those are the odds for kids under 18) is the BEST POSSIBLE OUTCOME.
The Coronavirus, not the beer
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
Getting it when you are 99.9999999% likely to not even have a runny nose (Yes those are the odds for kids under 18) is the BEST POSSIBLE OUTCOME.
May I ask what effects she's having?
Shes had a moving rash along her whole body.
We've gotten her some steroid creams prescribed and the doctor said that this was not an uncommon side effect.
Plus, for someone who barely got sick once a year she has overal felt a malaise day to day which is suspect.
Damn. Sorry to hear it.
We are probably the lucky ones.
Last edited:
Tapate50
Well-known member
Getting a little of that with my wife. She is going to get hormones checked and more in depth blood work after the first of the year. Her cycle has been off since shot as well.
Right now my lady is on birth control after the birth of our son so can't gauge that but reprodcutive health was the first thing we discussed when we realized that she may need to get vaxed.
I'm double-vaxxed and so are both of my elderly parents and we never experienced anything beyond a sore arm. I just hope we don't experience anything bad in the future.
acesfull86
Well-known member
https://www.wsj.com/articles/lockdown-science-pandemic-imperial-college-london-quarantine-social-distance-covid-fauci-omicron-11639930605?mod=opinion_lead_pos5
‘Follow the science” has been the battle cry of lockdown supporters since the Covid-19 pandemic began. Yet before March 2020, the mainstream scientific community, including the World Health Organization, strongly opposed lockdowns and similar measures against infectious disease.
That judgment came from historical analysis of pandemics and an awareness that societywide restrictions have severe socioeconomic costs and almost entirely speculative benefits. Our pandemic response, premised on lockdowns and closely related “non-pharmaceutical interventions,” or NPIs, represented an unprecedented and unjustified shift in scientific opinion from where it stood a few months before the discovery of Covid-19.
…..
What caused the scientific community to abandon its aversion to lockdowns? The empirical evidence didn’t change. Rather, the lockdown strategy originated from the same sources the WHO had heavily deprecated in its 2019 report: speculative and untested epidemiological models.
——————
What purpose do these international agencies serve if we’re going to abandon their advice the second an academic question becomes reality?
I think the US contributed $400-500M a year…money better spent on WV coal miners lungs, as far as I’m concerned.
BTW, here’s article 13 of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
‘Follow the science” has been the battle cry of lockdown supporters since the Covid-19 pandemic began. Yet before March 2020, the mainstream scientific community, including the World Health Organization, strongly opposed lockdowns and similar measures against infectious disease.
That judgment came from historical analysis of pandemics and an awareness that societywide restrictions have severe socioeconomic costs and almost entirely speculative benefits. Our pandemic response, premised on lockdowns and closely related “non-pharmaceutical interventions,” or NPIs, represented an unprecedented and unjustified shift in scientific opinion from where it stood a few months before the discovery of Covid-19.
…..
What caused the scientific community to abandon its aversion to lockdowns? The empirical evidence didn’t change. Rather, the lockdown strategy originated from the same sources the WHO had heavily deprecated in its 2019 report: speculative and untested epidemiological models.
——————
What purpose do these international agencies serve if we’re going to abandon their advice the second an academic question becomes reality?
I think the US contributed $400-500M a year…money better spent on WV coal miners lungs, as far as I’m concerned.
BTW, here’s article 13 of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Last edited:
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
That is some solid stuff in bold
sturg33
I
about 20 months ago
acesfull86
Well-known member
Josh Kraushaar
@HotlineJosh
On ABC News’ “This Week”:
KARL: “Are we ever going to get to a point where we won’t need to wear masks on airplanes?”
FAUCI: “I don’t think so. I think when you’re dealing with a closed space… you want to take that extra step.”
@HotlineJosh
On ABC News’ “This Week”:
KARL: “Are we ever going to get to a point where we won’t need to wear masks on airplanes?”
FAUCI: “I don’t think so. I think when you’re dealing with a closed space… you want to take that extra step.”
Sheffield10
Arizona Fall Leaguer
Holy crap… it’s almost like COVID is mad af at the vaxxers the way they are catching this stuff left and right the last couple of days
The vax makes you more susceptible to catching the virus.
We will learn that soon enough
Over him getting one?
acesfull86
Well-known member
"And you know what? I believe totally in your freedoms. I do. You've got to do what you have to do," Trump said. "But, I recommend: take the vaccines. I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines."
I dunno, sounds pretty reasonable to me.
I dunno, sounds pretty reasonable to me.