Tapate50
Well-known member
Taking this position on a med that has shown not to have had any negative aspects - only positive that was cheap and readily available was an interesting viewpoint.
But the vax is totally safe.
Sure.
The Coronavirus, not the beer
- Thread starter Runnin
- Start date
Taking this position on a med that has shown not to have had any negative aspects - only positive that was cheap and readily available was an interesting viewpoint.
But the vax is totally safe.
Sure.
Tapate50
Well-known member
Booohooohooo?
[tw]1565454762409066496[/tw]
https://www.cureus.com/articles/111...ictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects
Results
Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg). The remaining 71,548 participants were not included in the analysis. COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%) (risk rate (RR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.0001), and 25% lower than irregular users (4.54%) (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.73; p < 0.0001). Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users. After PSM, the matched analysis contained 283 subjects in each group of non-users and regular users, between regular users and irregular users, and 1,542 subjects between non-users and irregular users.
Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.
___________________________
Still noise like there is in any experiment but eventually it won't be able to be suppressed for any longer. Early outpatient care was always the way to attack the virus coupled with HCQ/Ivermectic/Vitamin D/Zinc/etc.... But that didn't go in line with the globalists plan for the world.
Idiots like BL peddled the Big Pharma propaganda like chumps because it was a Trump adjacent issue. Congrats on having some of the millions globally that died on your hands!
https://www.cureus.com/articles/111...ictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects
Results
Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg). The remaining 71,548 participants were not included in the analysis. COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%) (risk rate (RR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.0001), and 25% lower than irregular users (4.54%) (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.73; p < 0.0001). Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users. After PSM, the matched analysis contained 283 subjects in each group of non-users and regular users, between regular users and irregular users, and 1,542 subjects between non-users and irregular users.
Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.
___________________________
Still noise like there is in any experiment but eventually it won't be able to be suppressed for any longer. Early outpatient care was always the way to attack the virus coupled with HCQ/Ivermectic/Vitamin D/Zinc/etc.... But that didn't go in line with the globalists plan for the world.
Idiots like BL peddled the Big Pharma propaganda like chumps because it was a Trump adjacent issue. Congrats on having some of the millions globally that died on your hands!
Last edited:
Yup - Just like everything else they 'believed'.
Unserious people but they represent a small minority (a loud one unfortunately). We will end this insanity starting in November.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You still cant even admit who won the election but want to lecture others about admitting when they are wrong. You people are so predictable I dont even need your responses anymore. You are going to make false claims about what I said, mock those false claims, refuse to cite anything I said, and then try to change the subject.
acesfull86
Well-known member
I’ll never get Colbert. It’s not a left-right thing - most of the comedians/entertainers I like are on the left because that’s where most of them reside (at least publicly) - but Colbert has just never hit for me at all.
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
100% reduction. That's impressive!
11/21