The Don

[Hawk]

No it won't. I will not pull the lever for a man who brags about his infidelities, jokes about banging his daughter, owns strip joints, has made a killing off of ripping people off, who has held liberal positions for a long time despite his "conversion," who holds his immigration views, treats women as mere scum or sex objects, advocates war crimes, is vulgar, narcissistic, vindictive and thinned skinned.

You can have him.

It's not abandoning my ideology, it's holding to it.

This is a hyper-subjective character attack that, with the exception of your broad comment about immigration, doesn't speak toward political ideology at all. It does seem to highlight your personal ethos, but then again I'd also have to question the profundity of that given the method in which you've just baselessly assailed a man who has professed to having grown out of those days in his life.

Would you not have voted for Richard Nixon because he had a foul mouth? Would you have shunned Ronald Reagan because he used to advertise cigarettes? Pappy Bush because his dad was a Nazi?

But then again, if you are claiming to seriously consider supporting Hillary Clinton, I really have no idea what to do with you or if you actually have any ideology to claim.

 

[Hawk]

So here's a few on the Republican side who are not, or not ready to support Chump:

George H. W. Bush

George W. Bush

Jeb Bush

Paul Ryan

Lindsey Graham

Mitt Romney

John McCain

Sen Ben Sasse

Governor Charlie Baker (Massachusetts)

Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner

Maryland Governor Larry Hogan

Also, have not heard a peep in public about support from the likes of Ted Cruz and Marco Rubo

So, Chump is unifying the Republicans, eh?

With the exception of the Bushes, the rest of the 'politicians' on this list are tantamount to showboating clowns. Two failed (moderate) Presidential candidates, a soulless fish of a failed Veep candidate, a closeted gay man, and a foursome of wannabes.

You can also add the opportunist governor of my state, Nikki Haley, to the list. She recently turned down a VP slot before it was even offered to her, but that's a blessing, as keeping that farce of a leader out of higher office is a good thing.

 

[57Brave]

" tantamount to showboating clowns "
that is an argument for dismissing Trump detractors ?

like you say, "speed never slumps "

 

[Hawk]

" tantamount to showboating clowns "
that is an argument for dismissing Trump detractors ?

like you say, "speed never slumps "

That comment had nothing to do with "an argument for dismissing Trump detractors" ... just a general observation that I'm shocked you aren't lapping up since it aligns with your partisan shortcomings.

 

[57Brave]

http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/169132/what-is-the-origin-of-i-calls-em-like-i-sees-em

 

[Hawk]

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=bleeding+heart

 

[57Brave]

" but the exact image here may be the "bleeding heart of Jesus."

do you read what you link ?

 

[Hawk]

Isn't that the point?

 

[sturg33]

I honestly don't know what to do. I don't like any of the candidates. I refuse to vote for King Biff. Makes me sick to my stomach.

Why not proudly vote for the former 2 term republican governor of New Mexico who has an actual track record of true conservatism? He should be on all 50 state ballots

 

[bravesnumberone]

I still have a hard time believing there won't be a Republican like Romney that goes third party.

 

[Oklahomahawk]

Well here's one take on the whole thing.

 

[Oklahomahawk]

And in a "sort of" related story.

 

[Oklahomahawk]

And in another....oh never mind.

 

[Runnin]

Trump: My tax plan is negotiable

Trump: 'I don't know how people make it on $7.25 an hour'

It's going to become clear that Hillary is the more conservative, and the more 'Conservative', candidate. She's more prudent in her thoughts and actions and she's also more connected to the established power/money structure.

 

[Oklahomahawk]

Isn't that the point?

Sup fellow Hawk???

 

[Runnin]

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump on Sunday suggested that House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would face consequences for not endorsing the businessman as the party’s presidential nominee.

Speaking with NBC’s Chuck Todd, Trump would not rule out trying to remove the Wisconsin congressman from his post as chair of this summer’s GOP convention, a role traditionally granted to the speaker of the House, if Ryan did not come around.

“If he can’t endorse you, do you think he should be chair of the Convention?” Todd asked.

“I don’t want to mention it now. I’ll see after,” Trump said. “I will give you a very solid answer, if that happens, about one minute after that happens. Okay? But there’s no reason to give it right now. But I’ll be very quick with the answer. Let’s see what happens.”

 

[Oklahomahawk]

GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump on Sunday suggested that House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) would face consequences for not endorsing the businessman as the party’s presidential nominee.

Speaking with NBC’s Chuck Todd, Trump would not rule out trying to remove the Wisconsin congressman from his post as chair of this summer’s GOP convention, a role traditionally granted to the speaker of the House, if Ryan did not come around.

“If he can’t endorse you, do you think he should be chair of the Convention?” Todd asked.

“I don’t want to mention it now. I’ll see after,” Trump said. “I will give you a very solid answer, if that happens, about one minute after that happens. Okay? But there’s no reason to give it right now. But I’ll be very quick with the answer. Let’s see what happens.”

He's gonna make him an offer he can't refuse (in my best Brando voice).

 

[BedellBrave]

This is a hyper-subjective character attack that, with the exception of your broad comment about immigration, doesn't speak toward political ideology at all. It does seem to highlight your personal ethos, but then again I'd also have to question the profundity of that given the method in which you've just baselessly assailed a man who has professed to having grown out of those days in his life.

Would you not have voted for Richard Nixon because he had a foul mouth? Would you have shunned Ronald Reagan because he used to advertise cigarettes? Pappy Bush because his dad was a Nazi?

But then again, if you are claiming to seriously consider supporting Hillary Clinton, I really have no idea what to do with you or if you actually have any ideology to claim.

You have absolutely got to be kidding me! Baselessly?? I really have no idea what to say to that.

Nixon, Reagan, Pappy Bush, why wouldn't I have voted for them?

It's hard to argue ideology with a guy who doesn't have one except for whatever is good for him. Hey, but I know, he'll talk to really smart people and he's really smart, let's not forget that.

 

[BedellBrave]

With the exception of the Bushes, the rest of the 'politicians' on this list are tantamount to showboating clowns. Two failed (moderate) Presidential candidates, a soulless fish of a failed Veep candidate, a closeted gay man, and a foursome of wannabes.

You can also add the opportunist governor of my state, Nikki Haley, to the list. She recently turned down a VP slot before it was even offered to her, but that's a blessing, as keeping that farce of a leader out of higher office is a good thing.

Yeah, Anne Coulter, Sean Hannity, Mike Huckabee and Herman Cain, those are real winners.

 

[The Tariff King]

Hawk that's interesting. I thought you'd like Haley. She that bad in South Carolina?