The Official Thread of Pachemonium

thethe said:
That is succeeding at 20. That doesn't speak to his long term ability.
Click to expand...

?

thethe said:
And GM speak is always in code regardless of the GM. Never should take it literally.
Click to expand...

So, as always, we’re in your reality, where externalities have no correspondents, the narrative is what produces the best feels, and we impute only the most charitable motivations and actions to the organization until the logical inconsistencies demand a blood sacrifice, at which point we blindly and blithely vilify an appointed whipping-boy.
 
jpx7 said:
?



So, as always, we’re in your reality, where externalities have no correspondents, the narrative is what produces the best feels, and we impute only the most charitable motivations and actions to the organization until the logical inconsistencies demand a blood sacrifice, at which point we blindly and blithely vilify an appointed whipping-boy.
Click to expand...

You used a GM statement to counter what my thoughts were. You invited that into the conversation. Why should I have to rationalize it when I don't think that GM speak should ever be taken literally?
 
thethe said:
You used a GM statement to counter what my thoughts were. You invited that into the conversation. Why should I have to rationalize it when I don't think that GM speak should ever be taken literally?
Click to expand...

Why should you have to rationalize anything?

The idea that the previous administration planned their entire rebuild around three teenagers hitting their upper-tenth likelihoods is patently absurd. So you’re right, if you really believe that, we shouldn’t ask you to rationalize anything.

Facepalm, indeed.
 
jpx7 said:
Why should you have to rationalize anything?

The idea that the previous administration planned their entire rebuild around three teenagers hitting their upper-tenth likelihoods is patently absurd. So you’re right, if you really believe that, we shouldn’t ask you to rationalize anything.

Facepalm, indeed.
Click to expand...

Those kids were excelling at a high level when they were 17. Uncharacteristically high that projects well moving forward historically.

But please...continue.
 
How many players at 17 years of age performed so well at the appy league level? Anyone care to pull up some comparisons for players and juxtapose it to what Albies/Acuna did?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top