The Paul Pelosi Attacker

This whole case is weird. All I know is if someone broke into my house I wouldn't behave like Pelosi did.

The video corroborates a lot of the narrative that was reported, IMO. But I do not understand two things:

1. Why didn't the break in trip any security alarms

2. Why is Pelosi holding a drink when he answers the front door?
 
The video corroborates a lot of the narrative that was reported, IMO. But I do not understand two things:

1. Why didn't the break in trip any security alarms

2. Why is Pelosi holding a drink when he answers the front door?

I don't understand it either. You have to remember the Pelosi's are liberal so understanding their thinking may not be possible.
 
i suspect any release of the footage will not quell the speculation and conspiracy theorizing that now appear to be hard-wired into so many people's minds

that's my prediction

and oh i expect the footage to be released in due course...it could be that it is a practice of law enforcement to hold on to such evidence until a trial...maybe the legal eagles can chime in on this...but in a case like this i think it would be a good idea to release the kraken um footage

bumped for truthiness
 
this reporter got suspended for accidentally reporting the truth

guys... Paul called the police. Then he opened the door for them. then he went back to his crazy attacker to let his head get bashed in

duh!

well here is the reporter and a summary of what he reported

some of it is accurate: Pelosi opened the door

some isn't: that he walked back several feet toward his assailant

to quote again from the local DA's charging document:

When Off. Wilmes rangthe doorbell,Defendant directed Mr.Pelosi not to open
the door. ButMr.Pelosi opened the door with his left hand. As the door opened,the two
men stood inthe dimly litfoyer facing the officers. Mr.Pelosi nervously but calmly greeted
them. When the officer asked what was going on,Defendant smiled and said, everything's
good and pulled his hands toward his body. When an officer turned on his flashlight,
Defendant could be seen holdingthe bottom handle ofthe hammer with one hand and Mr.
Pelosi'srightarm with the other. Mr.Pelosi had his hand on the top ofthe handle nearthe
hammer itself. One officer ordered, Dropthe hammer! At the same time, Defendant
raised the hammer and said, um, nope." Defendant tried to pullthe hammer away from
Mr.Pelosi, which twisted Mr.Pelosi's arm back.

so why was his report wiped from the internet? he has since been suspended.

reminder that nobody got suspended for reporting about the hunter laptop being Russian disinfo... nobody got suspended about Russia collusion. nobody got suspended about NUCLEAR CODES!!!

I know you are no longer a critical thinker... but curious why you think that may be?

nothing sadder than a mentally impotent person

sad indeed
 
Everything you are posting is me reacting real time to the evolving reporting of what happened. It made no sense at all to me why Paul would open the door and then retreat back to the attacker, as was originally reported. That skepticism was correct as that obviously didn't happen. Kudos to me for using my brain

As I said above, I think the video does a good job of corroborating the official narrative. But two common sense questions do not make any sense to me. Why was there no private security system triggered of the third most powerful person in the world, and why was Paul holding a cocktail in his left hand when he answered the door?
 
It is rare for for a news org to suspend their journalists for reporting disinformation.

This was an exception. I'll take the L on that one.
 
Yeah I'm a little confused why Nancy Pelosi doesn't have private security systems in her SF mansion. Perhaps "I am intelligent" nsacpi can enlighten me
 
Back
Top