Reasonable and obvious. I'd also like to take a look at bundling and, truthfully, wouldn't be against limiting campaign donations exclusively to individuals and lowering the cap to something like $500 per person.
The REAL Russia scandal
- Thread starter thethe
- Start date
Reasonable and obvious. I'd also like to take a look at bundling and, truthfully, wouldn't be against limiting campaign donations exclusively to individuals and lowering the cap to something like $500 per person.
I guess Obama won’t get re-elected for a third term.
Obama still wields a lot of power. He is a great politician and is relatively young. For the dems sake you need that to stay in tact.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...tates-permission-to-meet-with-russian-nuclear
Now why would Bill request a meeting with high profile russians right before a vote?
Now why would Bill request a meeting with high profile russians right before a vote?
57Brave
Well-known member
why? Path to impeachment
No - Jail where the Clintons belong.
57Brave
Well-known member
I am reminded of the Dylan song Hurricane. A song about the boxer who was railroaded because of his color and outspoken nature. Circa early 60's
about the middle of the song he wrote:
"they got him for conspiracy
but they never said who with "
That is the way these HRC accusations and investigations go.
Like her or not, nothing ever amounts to anything beyond feeble attempts to embarrass.
/there are no charges,illegalities in these accusations.
Any of them
about the middle of the song he wrote:
"they got him for conspiracy
but they never said who with "
That is the way these HRC accusations and investigations go.
Like her or not, nothing ever amounts to anything beyond feeble attempts to embarrass.
/there are no charges,illegalities in these accusations.
Any of them
That's what happens when the people who are about to prosecute against the Clintons 'commit suicide'.
57Brave
Well-known member
What is the legal basis of an investigation ?
Not to beat an impreachment drum here --- the Trump investigations center around Obstruction of Justice, Money laudering, and colluding with a foreign interest. etc etc etc
Those are , if proven to be true, crimes.
What besides some ambiguous "benefiting handsomely" is the basis of these investigations and to what end ?
57Brave
Well-known member
30 years y'all been saying this and it is baseless
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked Panetta how it was possible that neither “the chair of the DNC and the Clinton campaign” knew about payments for the dossier.
“Well, it’s obviously something that the Intelligence Committee is going to have to look at,” Panetta said. “You know, knowing presidential campaigns, they’re big operations and somehow the left hand may not know what the right hand is doing. And that could be the case here.”
Panetta continued, “I really do think that the committee is going to have to get into this, determine just exactly what happened. Who knew what and when?”
Blitzer followed up by asking Panetta why Clinton campaign attorney Marc Elias didn’t tell Clinton campaign chair, John Podesta, they had paid for the dossier.
Elias was the lawyer was represented the Clinton campaign and DNC, during the election and is alleged to have paid Fusion GPS for the Trump dossier.
“Well, it certainly makes the situation very awkward,” Panetta said. “If you’re testifying and saying you have no knowledge, and the attorney sitting next to you is one of those that knew what was involved here, I think it does raise an issue that the committee is going to have to look at and determine just exactly who knew what.”
“Well, it’s obviously something that the Intelligence Committee is going to have to look at,” Panetta said. “You know, knowing presidential campaigns, they’re big operations and somehow the left hand may not know what the right hand is doing. And that could be the case here.”
Panetta continued, “I really do think that the committee is going to have to get into this, determine just exactly what happened. Who knew what and when?”
Blitzer followed up by asking Panetta why Clinton campaign attorney Marc Elias didn’t tell Clinton campaign chair, John Podesta, they had paid for the dossier.
Elias was the lawyer was represented the Clinton campaign and DNC, during the election and is alleged to have paid Fusion GPS for the Trump dossier.
“Well, it certainly makes the situation very awkward,” Panetta said. “If you’re testifying and saying you have no knowledge, and the attorney sitting next to you is one of those that knew what was involved here, I think it does raise an issue that the committee is going to have to look at and determine just exactly who knew what.”