The Siege of Minneapolis

Where did they get license plate information?

And no - Elected officials should not be coordinating monitoring of federal policing for protesting purposes.

It’s not a new revelation? When did you originally hear about it? Why did the state dem leader remove their FB (assuming this was validated).
On the license plates, don’t know, don’t care unless it’s a crime.

Why shouldn’t they coordinate on this unless they’re committing a crime?

Other reporters have mentioned the signal chat and the state leader allegedly has not deleted her Facebook from what I’ve seen.
 
On the license plates, don’t know, don’t care unless it’s a crime.

Why shouldn’t they coordinate on this unless they’re committing a crime?

Other reporters have mentioned the signal chat and the state leader allegedly has not deleted her Facebook from what I’ve seen.
Oh you don't care where they got state level information on location/identification. Of course you don't....

Now that they have the full Signal chat it will be great to bring your take back when its realized that this wasn't 'wholesome'.
 
Oh you don't care where they got state level information on location/identification. Of course you don't....

Now that they have the full Signal chat it will be great to bring your take back when its realized that this wasn't 'wholesome'.
Once you find a crime they committed, I’m happy to discuss the Signal chat.
 
The potential charges for the foot soldiers in the chat:
  • 18 U.S.C. § 111 (interfering with federal officers)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1512 / § 1505 (obstruction)

The additional potential charges for the elected officials in the chat:
Deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242)
Misuse of government resources
Honest services fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1346)

I suspect the actions of MN government in the near future will tell us what kind of fear they have about Signalgate. Apparently Walz reached out to Trump today to discuss cooperation. I’m sure that’s totally unrelated.
 
The potential charges for the foot soldiers in the chat:
  • 18 U.S.C. § 111 (interfering with federal officers)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1512 / § 1505 (obstruction)

The additional potential charges for the elected officials in the chat:
Deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242)
Misuse of government resources
Honest services fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1346)

I suspect the actions of MN government in the near future will tell us what kind of fear they have about Signalgate. Apparently Walz reached out to Trump today to discuss cooperation. I’m sure that’s totally unrelated.
Acting like its ok that state level Dems are organizing resistance to the federal government is just some nothingburger just shows their true intent.

This is a big fucking deal and like you said the timing of Waltz reaching out (this was not disputed by him) speaks to how nervous they are now.

If they confirm that state reps shared DMV information - Holy crap thats going to result in some shit.
 
Acting like its ok that state level Dems are organizing resistance to the federal government is just some nothingburger just shows their true intent.

This is a big fucking deal and like you said the timing of Waltz reaching out (this was not disputed by him) speaks to how nervous they are now.

If they confirm that state reps shared DMV information - Holy crap thats going to result in some shit.
BURY THEM
 
The potential charges for the foot soldiers in the chat:
  • 18 U.S.C. § 111 (interfering with federal officers)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy)
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1512 / § 1505 (obstruction)

The additional potential charges for the elected officials in the chat:
Deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242)
Misuse of government resources
Honest services fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1346)

I suspect the actions of MN government in the near future will tell us what kind of fear they have about Signalgate. Apparently Walz reached out to Trump today to discuss cooperation. I’m sure that’s totally unrelated.
There’s still a whole lot of assuming a crime was committed instead of showing how they committed a crime at this juncture. We’ve seen that a lot from the right on this topic.
 
Do you need to see them say, ICE is at the Home 2 Suites, go get them to find them most likely at fault here of doing something illegal?
 
Back
Top