Trump is always current news.
The Trump Presidency
- Thread starter The Tariff King
- Start date
Trump is always current news.
Reaching....mueller will get to the bottom of this.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
concentration camps is the correct term
and this administration and every single person working at or arguing for the practice of these overcrowded facilities while with holding soap and other basic needs should be prosecuted
sickening that it's 2019 and hearing "they are just doing their job" is still being used as a phrase
and this administration and every single person working at or arguing for the practice of these overcrowded facilities while with holding soap and other basic needs should be prosecuted
sickening that it's 2019 and hearing "they are just doing their job" is still being used as a phrase
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
you really will eat anything up
not that there is anything wrong with it but what does his dick taste like? is it orange flavor or is like his scalp and it isn't painted orange?
sturg33
I
I'm curious what Julip thinks since he is the arbitrator of past racism
We should just let them in right?
The treatment hasnt changed. You just pretend to care now.
But if not the current setup then what is the solution to the hindreds of thousands of migrants coming?
Whats changed?
Has the rate of death changed?
Has the rate of illness?
Where were you 5 years ago saying the same things?
The solution is easy. You work with Mexico to stengthen their southern border and build a wall.
Done.
57Brave
Well-known member
sturg33
I
Seriously though, what is the proposed Democrat solution?
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
The overarching policy for detentions has changed. The rate of detentions has changed, with the administration budgeting for double-digit % increases in the number of detentions each year. The family separation policy is a Trump initiative. So, yes, there are material differences between then and now.
I’m going to repeat the mantra: there was and is robust criticism on the left for Obama’s immigration policies. But what you—and sturg—are doing with the “but Obama” thing is willfully ignoring easily verifiable facts.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
I think I’ve been pretty clear about my distaste for Biden as a candidate.
Julio3000
<B>A Chip Off the Old Rock</B>
This question has been studied, with varying results, but the main takeaways are that the impact of immigrants in the wages of unskilled laborers are real but small to negligible, and generally considered to be outweighed by the broader economic benefits. You’re talking about immigration destroying the middle class, though.
Where does immigration fall among factors like globalization, automation, and the decline of organized labor? It doesn’t even rate.
Oh the fantastic studies fundrd by groups that want cheap labor. This is like agreeing with the koch brothers immigration stances. Its simple economic theory. More supply of something and the intersection with demand decreases price.
The rate is changing because catch and release is not being fully practiced. I suppose we should just allow everyone into the country because they claim they are seeking asylum but of course skipping right over Mexico where the asylum they seek can be granted there.
Family separation is a necessity for the childrens safety based on the facts on the ground. Are you just going to flat out deny that children aren't being used as props? Just going to turn a blind eye to that?
And I'm going to repeat to you - You can say there was robust criticism but there weren't trips made to the border, there weren't people crying on TV, there weren't people calling Obama a Nazi so please save me your "There was criticism of Obama".