Let's not even try to pretend that isn't a talk radio-level take. Sorry if that cones across as elitist.
There's nothing elite about denialism.
Let's not even try to pretend that isn't a talk radio-level take. Sorry if that cones across as elitist.
And it's truly offensive to you?
Don't choke on that fake indignation bro.
Do 3/4 of those South Georgians also try to use their 'Cherokee heritage' to gain a competitive advantage in the college admissions process?
I was told I had some 'Cherokee blood' growing up, but the thought never even occurred to me to take advantage of collegiate racial quotas by fully affiliating with my tribe.
That, to me, is much more troubling than calling someone "Pocahontas" .... which is absolutely, positively not a racial slur.
Calling a dark-skinned Cuban a ******?
Please.
It's like calling a black man with a bald head and a mustache Steve Harvey.
Is it uncouth and pretty ignorant? Sure. Racist? Get the **** out of here.
you should read more and write less
................................
The Globe obtained a portion of Warren’s application to Rutgers, which asks if prospective students want to apply for admission under the school’s Program for Minority Group Students. Warren answered “no.”
For her employment documents at the University of Texas, Warren indicated that she was “white.”
But Penn’s 2005 Minority Equity Report identified her as the recipient of a 1994 faculty award, listing her name in bold to signify that she was a minority.
The Herald has twice quoted Charles Fried, the head of the Harvard appointing committee that recommended Warren for her position in 1995, saying that the Democratic candidate’s heritage didn’t come up during the course of her hiring. “It simply played no role in the appointments process,” he said. “It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty.”
The Herald later quoted Fried, a former U.S. Solicitor General under President Ronald Reagan, saying, “I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...fa5a255a9258_blog.html?utm_term=.7311ffd05d0f
The term is racist in that Pocahontas was of Tsenacommacah, Warren's family claims were that her history included Delaware and Cherokee ancestry.
Point being -- one native American is the same as the other ? As in, "they all lok the same" haven't we been through this recently in police misidentification of victims?
The notion of hurling the insult of "Pocahontas" ignorant of American native pride in their tribal ancestry.
You will find sometime soon, following this party line, excuse me, the Trump party line, is a rabbit hole one finds difficult to crawl out of.
And what difference does her heritage or claims make?
Is it like she lied for a Security Clearance?
Or about the size of her inaugural crowd? Or the millions of voters that didn't get counted for her"
Or etc etc etc
Refer above where for years the Trump family told people they were Swedish.