Yes - all you will need is a ladder to get over a state of the art wall.
The Wall will be a one time expense while renegotiation of NAFTA will have a recurring impact.
Yes - a state of the wall is a one time expense with no maintenance expenses at all.
" Trump was reportedly angry that John Kelly told congressional Democrats that Trump’s views on his signature border wall had been “uninformed.”
Greg Sargent
Verified account @ThePlumLineGS
20m20 minutes ago
Recall the history.
Trump originally decided to let Dreamers stay but use them to get more concessions.
Trump asked for bipartisan deal doing that.
Trump was given what he asked for.
Trump rejected it b/c it wasn't sufficiently white nationalist.
57 manages to blame Trump for breaking wall promise and duping supporters while also blaming Trump for trying to get Wall done
Easy to win arguments when you get to bitch about both sides
I would assume he's ribbing Trump supporters regarding the wall not being built, not complaining.
Sure... but then he uses as justification for Trump breaking promises and shouldn't be promised... that his supporters were duped, etc
Can't have it both ways
Sure... but then he uses as justification for Trump breaking promises and shouldn't be promised... that his supporters were duped, etc
Can't have it both ways
Eh, I feel like there's an argument to be made that the wall was both a dumb idea and a promise Trump couldn't keep to his base.
If he can't get the wall funded, yes?Is there?
So we can't actually have the argument yet, can we?
My argument was meant to be contingent upon there being no wall built, given the entire point of Sturg's issue with 57. Sturg was arguing 57 can't both call Trump a liar for there not being a wall and also argue that the wall being built would be an issue. I disagree with those being contradictory.