One of the fine people found on both sides, neo-Nazi James Fields, found guilty on 10 counts including first-degree murder, in the Charlottesville vehicular assault.
Is talking about actual policy stuff allowed?
[TW]1071146400019169280[/TW]
I guess I’m struggling with the idea that AOC is somehow more “economically illiterate” than mainstream Republicans who’ve actually been in charge for years, insisting that tax cuts will pay for themselves, etc.
after going on for days about a duly elected 1st term Congressperson that has yet to be sworn in ,cast a vote,attended a committee meeting , officially met with constituents or even been given a committee assignment,
Sure feel "free" to discuss policy
When do we reach the point in the stock market that those who said it was Trump's economy from day 1 do a 180 and say Trump isnt responsible for the stock market plunge?
The right wing media's obsession and scrutinization of AOC is hilarious.
She really is the new witch to hunt after. They know Pelosi is going to be in charge and if Trump has any hope whatsoever of Pelosi working with him he and Fox News are shifting everyone's attention to AOC instead. They've used Pelosi as a GOTV card for the last few years and now they need her to try to get anything done.
Have to admit they didnt even give Bernie this much attention and hes arguably more of a "socialist" than AOC is. Because they were too busy with their Hillary obsession. Just goes to show you it has less to do with "socialism" but the right instead just playing identity politics to insecure white men.
Tax cuts have driven substantial economic growth this year... they haven't paid for themselves but they have brought in more more revenue than the amount was cut.
The fatal flaw here, is that the government not only didn't cut spending, it substantially increased spending while cutting taxes.
Shame on all lawmakers for doing it. Maybe AOC will bring in spending cuts.
Hmm. Well, heck. Simple Keynesian spending has a multiplier effect in economic growth. Even welfare spending does that. I’m talking about the same old song that gets sung every time tax cuts are contemplated, which is that they will finance themselves through increased revenue, aka Laffer Curve magic. How is that math any less fuzzy?
I didn't say it wasn't fuzzy.
I am saying that the effects of AOC's policy goals dwarf the effects the tax cuts had on the deficit. And if you were concerned about the tax cuts, I'm sure you're much more concerned about free everything for everyone
So what you call bad math from one side (but, let’s be real, you haven’t really investigated) is impossible to even comprehend, but what you acknowledge is bad math from the other side is cool, let’s keep doing it.
Well, the thing is, you can make a lot of that math work, too, it’s just that some folks aren’t going to like the result. Affordable health care, child care, education subsidies, infrastructure, carbon reduction .... I’ll for sure be in favor of trying to figure out how to square that circle before another generation of trickle-down fools’ gold and subprime mortgage-backed CDOs.