The Trump Presidency

Julio3000 said:
You seem to be evading the question by conflating the views and principles of the organization with that of, best I can tell, one of its members whom you’ve posted about a lot. You’ve made the moral equivalence—now let’s explore it. How are the Women’s March and the organizers of UTR similar? What’s generally objectionable about the WM and how does that compare to UTR?
Click to expand...

You equated the attendees as endorsing the views of the organizers (I just went back to read your post)

I'm asking you if the attendees of the women's March endorse the anti-semetic racisms of it's founders and organizers?

If not, why don't you impose different standards?
 
Rebecca Ballhaus
‏
Verified account

@rebeccaballhaus
7m7 minutes ago
More
A software fix to the Boeing 737 MAX was delayed for months as discussions between regulators and Boeing dragged on—and U.S. officials said the government shutdown halted work on the fix for five weeks.

more brilliance from this admin
 
sturg33 said:
You equated the attendees as endorsing the views of the organizers (I just went back to read your post)

I'm asking you if the attendees of the women's March endorse the anti-semetic racisms of it's founders and organizers?

If not, why don't you impose different standards?
Click to expand...

I’d like you to first establish that the founders and organizers of the women’s march are anti-Semitic racists, and that the organization’s mission and principles reflect that. Because that’s clearly the case with UTR.

Since you continue to draw a moral equivalency, I’d like you to show your work a bit.
 
“Imagine being someone who referred to Obama as a King or Tyrant and then supporting Trump’s effort to steal money from military construction projects so he can build a wall Congress specifically didn’t authorize.

Now imagine there’s an entire political party of these people.”
 
I smell another quarter of a million dollar law suit:
What a bunch of grifters


“At this time, the evidence indicates that our client has been falsely accused in a manner that she may never recover from,” Turk said in the statement. “Her name, her reputation and her honor have been destroyed.”

“Cindy Yang seems to be another casualty, as a supporter of our president.” Turk added.
 
"Why do we want all these people from '****hole countries' coming here?" - 45


One day we'll have a real leader in the Oval Office again to represent our country with dignity instead of being a daily embarrassment.

--------

XeIabay.png
 
Individual-1 said:
"Why do we want all these people from '****hole countries' coming here?" - 45


One day we'll have a real leader in the Oval Office again to represent our country with dignity instead of being a daily embarrassment.

--------

XeIabay.png
Click to expand...

Without immigrants to prop up cultural and academic achievement the U.S. would be a ****hole country for sure, though one could argue than in many ways it already is.
 
Individual-1 said:
"Why do we want all these people from '****hole countries' coming here?" - 45


One day we'll have a real leader in the Oval Office again to represent our country with dignity instead of being a daily embarrassment.

--------

XeIabay.png
Click to expand...

Can I post a pic of an abortion survivor for you to look at while the left defends infanticide?

The reason Trump is gonna get votes is bc the dems have gone insane
 
You Dems know he is just a prop to spread your message. Everyone does it.

Also they can bring in murders, tortures from those from those countries and use them for props like the Republicans can.

Media owns the market and will shut out things you all do not want to see.

<clappy hands> for manipulating the air.
 
The judge in the Michael Cohen case has approved a redacted version of search warrant materials found by investigators and ordered that it be filed on the public docket tomorrow. Should make for some interesting reading.

Back in February the judge wrote:

"The public interest in the underlying subject matter of the materials -- which implicates the integrity of the 2016 presidential election -- is substantial."

Indeed.
 
Last edited:
Disclosing the materials with certain portions redacted strikes the appropriate balance between public access and prosecutors’ desire for confidentiality to protect its ongoing investigations, judge Pauley said in his February ruling.

"At this stage, wholesale disclosure of the materials would reveal the scope and direction of the government’s ongoing investigation," Pauley wrote. "It would also unveil subjects of the investigation and the potential conduct under scrutiny, the full volume and nature of the evidence gathered thus far, and the sources of information provided to the government."

I suspect even the redacted version will be of significant public interest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top