goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
Poor taste on the cast.
Their whole platform to every vulnerable group in the USA is in poor taste
Poor taste on the cast.
Trump's standard answer: We're gonna be looking at a lot of things. A lot of people are saying that bad things are happening and we're gonna be looking at a lot of things. Next question.
Still to this day the only time someone has ever Stump The Trump.
Trump's standard answer: We're gonna be looking at a lot of things. A lot of people are saying that bad things are happening and we're gonna be looking at a lot of things. Next question.
But what's all that got to do with Pence's right as a paying customer to sit down and enjoy a play without people from the stage calling him out with shoptalk? At least they should let him do something in office first. I get that just joining Trump's ticket is in itself reprehensible, but the actors would be more likely to move him with their performance than with impromptu finger-wagging. They could’ve won more points with him with a neutral and respectful greeting to the VP-elect.Who knew Mike Pence would run into a hostile situation at a Broadway play ?
..........................
1. Supporting a constitutional amendment to ban marriage equality
In 2006, then-Rep. Pence told 100 of his fellow Republicans that he supported*a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex weddings. Or as Pence put it, supported “God’s plan” in the face of the destruction of civilization.*“Societal collapse was always brought about following an advent of the deterioration of marriage and family,” Pence complained.
etc
But what's all that got to do with Pence's right as a paying customer to sit down and enjoy a play without people from the stage calling him out with shoptalk?why shouldn't they ?
I for one find his record on #5 above more reprehensible - deplorable if you will
Unless it comes to physical violence against him or his family Mike Pence's record and stances deserve every public scolding affordable
Certainly he has a right to go into the lions den. But don't gripe when lions act like lions,
........................
Pence supporters painted swastikas on Beastie Boy playground in Jewish Brooklyn neighborhood
Not a peep or apology from him.
Once more, one side is continually expected to behave with civility yet another side is granted a pass at all turns
It is going to be a long 4 years
I completely understand the cast point
and admire their restraint
..........................
from Washington Post on Trump's reaction:
“Instead of doing what a Franklin Roosevelt or a John Kennedy or a Lyndon Johnson would have done, he’s exacerbating the differences by saying they owe him an apology,” Dallek said. “For what? What were they asking for? They were asking for a kind of regard for minorities. It wasn’t as if they were asking him to give up the office.”
But what's all that got to do with Pence's right as a paying customer to sit down and enjoy a play without people from the stage calling him out with shoptalk?why shouldn't they ?
I for one find his record on #5 above more reprehensible - deplorable if you will
Unless it comes to physical violence against him or his family Mike Pence's record and stances deserve every public scolding affordable
Certainly he has a right to go into the lions den. But don't gripe when lions act like lions,
........................
Pence supporters painted swastikas on Beastie Boy playground in Jewish Brooklyn neighborhood
Not a peep or apology from him.
Once more, one side is continually expected to behave with civility yet another side is granted a pass at all turns
It is going to be a long 4 years
I completely understand the cast point
and admire their restraint
..........................
from Washington Post on Trump's reaction:
“Instead of doing what a Franklin Roosevelt or a John Kennedy or a Lyndon Johnson would have done, he’s exacerbating the differences by saying they owe him an apology,” Dallek said. “For what? What were they asking for? They were asking for a kind of regard for minorities. It wasn’t as if they were asking him to give up the office.”
You do know that the board think you are a f*cking joke. You lost they won, get over it. Your old shaking hands ass couldn't use a crayon if it tried and lord help the Play Doh.
When Left leaning peeps on this board give you a hard time they know that you have a few screws loose.......but the common sense ones like me already knew that.
Are there some who would push for more? I would assume you would think there are. If so what more would you venture to think they'd want?
When I say, "a common full LGBT agenda," I mean that within the public domain, all citizens must not merely acknowledge all the legal rights that heterosexuals enjoy, but there can be no refusal to render public service to LGBT in the pursuit of those rights no matter one's religious convictions, no public practice by those who disagree will be allowed, and ultimately that no public (or familial) disapproval be tolerated. Ultimately, it's not about accommodation or acceptance it's about approval. To give public disapproval will be hate speech. To teach disapproval will be brainwashing. Neither will be tolerated. First via cultural pressures. But likely and eventually by legal pressures.
I also thought the Hamilton thing was in poor taste. Just didn't seem like the time to preach at Pence when the audience was already giving him Bronx cheers.
The cast had the stage and the opportunity to be influential with their art.
That seems like a pretty neat encapsulation of exactly the kind of hysteria that you're complaining about upthread. I'll concede your point that there is and has been overheated rhetoric going on, but add that this doesn't seem too different.
As for Sessions and his time as US Attorney...no, it's not the same. Not necessarily.
Desegregation was court-ordered, and there were both sanctions for not complying and a specific JD mandate to enforce. The vote fraud case fell within his discretion as prosecutor. He chose to bring the case, and lost it.
Now, it's theoretically possible that he was pressured by higher-ups to bring the case, but the salient point is that it was voluntary in a way that enforcing a desegregation order is not.
Ok, well, I guess it goes without saying that I disagree. Your opinion on the degree to which Christians' ability to teach and practice their faith is compromised sounds a lot like the kind of overreaction and "crying wolf" that you'd be criticizing if it weren't your ox being gored. Anyway, even the disagreement is stated with affection.